Stecker Eric C, Vickers Catherine, Waltz Justin, Socoteanu Carmen, John Benjamin T, Mariani Ronald, McAnulty John H, Gunson Karen, Jui Jonathan, Chugh Sumeet S
Heart Rhythm Research Laboratory, Division of Cardiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Mar 21;47(6):1161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.045. Epub 2006 Feb 23.
We sought to evaluate the contribution of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction toward occurrence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in the general population, and to identify distinguishing characteristics of SCD in the absence of LV dysfunction.
Patients who manifest warning symptoms and signs are more likely to undergo evaluation before SCD. Although prevalence of LV dysfunction in this subgroup may overestimate the prevalence in overall SCD, this is the only means of assessment in the general population.
All cases of SCD in Multnomah County, Oregon (population 660,486; 2002 to 2004) were prospectively ascertained in the ongoing Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study. We retrospectively assessed LV ejection fraction (LVEF) among subjects who underwent evaluation of LV function before SCD (normal: > or =55%; mildly to moderately reduced: 36% to 54%; and severely reduced: < or =35%). Of a total of 714 SCD cases (annual incidence 54 per 100,000), LV function was assessed in 121 (17%).
The LVEF was severely reduced in 36 patients (30%), mildly to moderately reduced in 27 (22%), and normal in 58 (48%). Patients with normal LVEF were distinguishable by younger age (66 +/- 15 years vs. 74 +/- 10 years; p = 0.001), higher proportion of females (47% vs. 27%; p = 0.025), higher prevalence of seizure disorder (14% vs. 0%; p = 0.002), and lower prevalence of established coronary artery disease (50% vs. 81%; p < 0.001).
In this community-wide study, only one-third of the evaluated SCD cases had severe LV dysfunction meeting current criteria for prophylactic cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. The SCD cases with normal LV function had several distinguishing clinical characteristics. These findings support the aggressive development of alternative screening methods to enhance identification of patients at risk.
我们试图评估左心室(LV)功能障碍对普通人群心源性猝死(SCD)发生的影响,并确定无LV功能障碍时SCD的鉴别特征。
出现警示症状和体征的患者在SCD前更有可能接受评估。尽管该亚组中LV功能障碍的患病率可能高估了总体SCD中的患病率,但这是普通人群中唯一的评估方法。
在进行中的俄勒冈州意外猝死研究中,前瞻性确定了俄勒冈州马尔特诺马县(人口660,486;2002年至2004年)的所有SCD病例。我们回顾性评估了在SCD前接受LV功能评估的受试者的LV射血分数(LVEF)(正常:≥55%;轻度至中度降低:36%至54%;严重降低:≤35%)。在总共714例SCD病例(年发病率为每100,000人中有54例)中,对121例(17%)进行了LV功能评估。
36例患者(30%)的LVEF严重降低,27例(22%)轻度至中度降低,58例(48%)正常。LVEF正常的患者具有以下特点:年龄较轻(66±15岁对74±10岁;p = 0.001)、女性比例较高(47%对27%;p = 0.025)、癫痫发作障碍患病率较高(14%对0%;p = 0.002)以及已确诊冠状动脉疾病的患病率较低(50%对81%;p < 0.001)。
在这项全社区范围的研究中,仅三分之一接受评估的SCD病例存在符合当前预防性心脏复律除颤器植入标准的严重LV功能障碍。LV功能正常的SCD病例有几个独特的临床特征。这些发现支持积极开发替代筛查方法以加强对高危患者的识别。