Suppr超能文献

颧骨骨折固定术后并发症:可生物降解材料之间是否存在差异,以及它们与钛质骨固定术相比如何?

Complications after zygoma fracture fixation: is there a difference between biodegradable materials and how do they compare with titanium osteosynthesis?

作者信息

Wittwer Gert, Adeyemo Wasiu Lanre, Yerit Kaan, Voracek Martin, Turhani Dritan, Watzinger Franz, Enislidis Georg

机构信息

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Apr;101(4):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.07.026. Epub 2006 Jan 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Biodegradable materials are particularly useful for the fixation of zygomatic fractures. Different systems are commercially available. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of zygomatic fracture fixation using 3 biodegradable systems and a titanium osteosynthesis system.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients with displaced fractures of the zygomatic bone presenting at our department from October 2001 to May 2003 were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 treatment groups for fracture fixation (study group A: LactoSorb: n = 18; study group B: BioSorb: n = 18; study group C: Delta: n = 18). Treatment outcome and complication rates were compared with a historic patient group with zygomatic fractures fixed with titanium osteosynthesis (control group D: n = 15).

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients (study groups A + B + C: n = 49; control group D: n = 15) were followed for at least 24 months (range: 24 to 44 months). Forty-nine patients in the biodegradable study groups (group A: n = 15; group B: n = 17; group C: n = 17) who had their fractures fixed with biodegradable plates and screws alone or in combination with titanium plates and screws were reviewed postoperatively. Uneventful healing occurred during the entire follow-up period in 39 (80%) out of 49 patients in the biodegradable groups (A + B + C) and in 12 (80%) out of 15 patients in group D. Ten patients in groups A + B + C developed postoperative complications (infection: n = 3; soft tissue dehiscence: n = 2; implant-related tissue reactions: n = 5), compared with 3 patients in group D (soft tissue dehiscence: n = 1; unspecific pain: n = 2) (P = .97). Complications occurred in 4 patients in group A and 3 patients each in groups B and C. Smokers developed significantly more postoperative complications than nonsmokers in groups A + B + C (P = .01).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference between biodegradable osteosynthesis materials or between biodegradable materials and titanium fixation with respect to fracture healing and postoperative complications. Postoperative complications were of a minor nature and resolved spontaneously or after local therapy. Smoking habits may play a significant role in the incidence of complications with biodegradable materials.

摘要

目的

可生物降解材料在颧骨骨折固定中特别有用。市场上有不同的系统可供选择。本研究的目的是比较使用3种可生物降解系统和1种钛骨固定系统进行颧骨骨折固定的临床效果。

研究设计

2001年10月至2003年5月在我科就诊的颧骨移位骨折患者被随机分配到3个骨折固定治疗组中的1组(研究组A:LactoSorb:n = 18;研究组B:BioSorb:n = 18;研究组C:Delta:n = 18)。将治疗结果和并发症发生率与一组采用钛骨固定术治疗颧骨骨折的历史患者组(对照组D:n = 15)进行比较。

结果

共有64例患者(研究组A+B+C:n = 49;对照组D:n = 15)接受了至少24个月(范围:24至44个月)的随访。对49例在可生物降解研究组(A组:n = 15;B组:n = 17;C组:n = 17)中单独使用或联合钛板和螺钉使用可生物降解板和螺钉固定骨折的患者进行了术后复查。在可生物降解组(A+B+C)的49例患者中,有39例(80%)在整个随访期间愈合顺利,在D组的15例患者中有12例(80%)愈合顺利。A+B+C组有10例患者出现术后并发症(感染:n = 3;软组织裂开:n = 2;植入物相关组织反应:n = 5),而D组有3例患者出现并发症(软组织裂开:n = 1;非特异性疼痛:n = 2)(P = 0.97)。A组有4例患者出现并发症,B组和C组各有3例患者出现并发症。在A+B+C组中,吸烟者术后并发症明显多于非吸烟者(P = 0.01)。

结论

在骨折愈合和术后并发症方面,可生物降解骨固定材料之间或可生物降解材料与钛固定之间没有显著差异。术后并发症性质较轻,可自发缓解或经局部治疗后缓解。吸烟习惯可能在可生物降解材料并发症的发生率中起重要作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验