Benjamin Ludy T
Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, 77843-4235, USA.
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Mar;91(2):414-25. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.414.
No individual in the early history of American psychology is more identified with the promotion of applied psychology than Hugo Münsterberg, whose books and articles on applied topics such as industrial psychology, forensic psychology, psychotherapy, and educational psychology made him one of the most visible psychologists of his day. But there is an earlier chapter to Münsterberg's life that tells a very different story of a Münsterberg opposed to application. The story begins in 1898 when he wrote an article for an American magazine in which he told teachers that the findings of experimental psychology had no relevance for education, setting off a firestorm of controversy among his colleagues in psychology and education. This article describes Münsterberg's early denigration of applied psychology and his subsequent transformation as applied psychologist. Reasons for that transformation are discussed as well as issues involving the stigma associated with applied psychology and the popularization of psychology.
在美国心理学早期历史上,没有哪位人物比雨果·闵斯特伯格更能与应用心理学的推广联系在一起。他关于工业心理学、法医心理学、心理治疗和教育心理学等应用主题的书籍和文章,使他成为当时最知名的心理学家之一。但闵斯特伯格的人生有更早的一段经历,讲述了一个截然不同的、反对应用的闵斯特伯格的故事。这个故事始于1898年,当时他为一本美国杂志撰写了一篇文章,在文中他告诉教师们,实验心理学的研究结果与教育无关,这在他心理学和教育学领域的同事中引发了一场激烈的争议风暴。本文描述了闵斯特伯格早期对应用心理学的诋毁以及他后来作为应用心理学家的转变。文中还讨论了促成这种转变的原因,以及与应用心理学相关的污名化问题和心理学的普及问题。