Bartlett E S, Walters T D, Symons S P, Fox A J
Department of Neuroradiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill, USA.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Mar;27(3):632-7.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Identification of carotid near-occlusion is essential before calculation of percent stenosis because stroke risk is lower than other severe stenosis and the treatment benefit is less. Calculations with reduced distal diameters are fallacious. CT angiography (CTA) is convenient and accurately quantifies internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis.
In a blinded protocol, 268 carotid artery CTAs for known or suspected carotid disease were independently evaluated by 2 neuroradiologists. All carotid arteries were measured in millimeters at the narrowest diameter of the stenotic bulb, distal ICA well beyond the tapering bulb, and distal external carotid artery (ECA). Near-occlusions were independently identified, with disagreements settled by consensus meeting. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis defined the threshold values that best predicted near-occlusion according to (1) ICA stenosis, (2) distal ICA, (3) distal ICA: contralateral distal ICA, and (4) distal ICA: ECA. Paired permutations of variables were evaluated.
Forty-two near-occlusion distal ICAs were identified. The ROC-derived threshold values determined near-occlusion carotid stenosis with a sensitivity range, 90.2-97.3; specificity, 84.1-89.9; positive predictive value (PPV), 61.3-66.7; and negative predictive value (NPV), 96.7-99.4. Ranges for paired permutations were also determined: sensitivity, 82.9-91.9; specificity, 95.4-96.8; PPV, 78.6-85.7; and NPV, 96.3-98.4.
Threshold values provide guidelines for CTA interpretation when assessing carotid artery disease and the presence of near-occlusion. Ultimate identification of near-occlusion requires the interpreter's judgment, with attention to the following criteria: (1) notable stenosis of the ICA bulb and (2) distal ICA caliber reduction compared with (A) expected size, (B) contralateral ICA, and (C) ipsilateral ECA. Near-occlusion distal ICAs can be reliably identified on CTA.
背景/目的:在计算狭窄百分比之前识别颈动脉近乎闭塞至关重要,因为其卒中风险低于其他严重狭窄,且治疗获益较小。使用缩小的远端直径进行计算是错误的。CT血管造影(CTA)方便且能准确量化颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄。
在一项盲法方案中,2名神经放射科医生对268例已知或疑似颈动脉疾病的颈动脉CTA进行独立评估。所有颈动脉在狭窄球部最窄直径处、狭窄球部远端的ICA以及远端颈外动脉(ECA)处均以毫米为单位进行测量。独立识别近乎闭塞情况,分歧通过共识会议解决。受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析根据以下指标确定最能预测近乎闭塞的阈值:(1)ICA狭窄,(2)远端ICA,(3)远端ICA:对侧远端ICA,以及(4)远端ICA:ECA。对变量的配对排列进行评估。
识别出42例远端ICA近乎闭塞。ROC得出的阈值确定近乎闭塞的颈动脉狭窄,其敏感性范围为90.2 - 97.3;特异性为84.1 - 89.9;阳性预测值(PPV)为61.3 - 66.7;阴性预测值(NPV)为96.7 - 99.4。还确定了配对排列的范围:敏感性为82.9 - 91.9;特异性为95.4 - 96.8;PPV为78.6 - 85.7;NPV为96.3 - 98.4。
在评估颈动脉疾病和近乎闭塞情况时,阈值为CTA解读提供了指导。近乎闭塞的最终识别需要解读者的判断,并关注以下标准:(1)ICA球部明显狭窄,以及(2)与(A)预期大小、(B)对侧ICA和(C)同侧ECA相比,远端ICA管径缩小。在CTA上可以可靠地识别远端ICA近乎闭塞情况。