Bertoncini Chiara, Cioni Erica, Grampi Barbara, Gandini Paola
Department of Orthodontics, University of Pisa, Italy.
Prog Orthod. 2006;7(1):76-84.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of non-latex elastics regarding their use in clinical practice for latex-intolerant individuals.
In this study, 80 latex and 80 non-latex elastics produced by Leone S.p.A. were divided into 4 groups of 20 elastics each. They were submitted to traction tests after being placed in Ringer's solution for different periods of time. Force loss and permanent deformation (considered as the difference between the initial and final diameter) was then determined in order to evaluate the behaviour of each elastic after every test. The variation of force was calculated using the Instron Machine, while the profile projector was used to measure the elastics' diameter.
The latex elastics undergo less loss of force than the non latex elastics. The difference between the two tested samples becomes significant after 24 hours. Regarding the variation of the inner diameter, in every test, non-latex elastics showed a more significant deformation than latex ones and the difference was significant.
When compared to latex elastics, non-latex elastics showed a greater deformation of the inner diameter and the forces generated in Ringer's solution are significantly less after 24 hours. To conclude, latex-free elastics are suitable for orthodontic treatment in patients with allergies, although further study to investigate the dynamic behaviour of latex- free elastics.
本研究的目的是评估非乳胶弹力线在临床实践中用于乳胶不耐受个体的有效性。
在本研究中,将Leone S.p.A.生产的80根乳胶弹力线和80根非乳胶弹力线分成4组,每组20根弹力线。将它们置于林格氏液中不同时间后进行拉伸试验。然后测定力的损失和永久变形(视为初始直径与最终直径之差),以评估每次试验后每种弹力线的性能。使用英斯特朗机器计算力的变化,同时使用轮廓投影仪测量弹力线的直径。
乳胶弹力线的力损失比非乳胶弹力线少。两种测试样品之间的差异在24小时后变得显著。关于内径的变化,在每次试验中,非乳胶弹力线的变形比乳胶弹力线更显著,且差异显著。
与乳胶弹力线相比,非乳胶弹力线内径的变形更大,在林格氏液中24小时后产生的力显著更小。总之,无乳胶弹力线适用于过敏患者的正畸治疗,尽管需要进一步研究来调查无乳胶弹力线的动态性能。