Suppr超能文献

无乳胶正畸弹力线动态行为的实验评估

Experimental evaluation of latex-free orthodontic elastics' behaviour in dynamics.

作者信息

Gandini Paola, Gennai Rossella, Bertoncini Chiara, Massironi Sarah

机构信息

University of Pisa, Department of Orthodontics, Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Prog Orthod. 2007;8(1):88-99.

Abstract

Latex-free products have been introduced in orthodontics following a growth in the number of latex allergy cases reported. The aim of this study is to compare the efficiency between latex-free and latex elastics which are normally used in clinics. In this study, 80 latex-free and 80 latex elastics were divided into 4 groups of 20 elastics. Each group was exposed to a variable number of opening/closing cycles (100, 1200, 2400 or 4800), using a specially adapted machine which simulated the stretching of these elastomeric products during the dynamics of the mouth. The machine extended the elastics' inner diameter from 3 to 5 times its original dimension (the extension being comparable to that experienced during the opening/closing movements of the mouth). Following this, the elastics underwent a dynamic tensile test using the Instron 4301 machine to evaluate possible force loss and deformation. The different test results were analyzed using the Student t-test and ANOVA test of Tuckey. The test results showed differences between the two types of elastics particularly in the inner diameter behaviour: the increase in the inner diameter of the non-latex elastics' was pronounced. The forces applied by both types of elastics were similar until 2400 opening/closing cycles were reached. Thereafter, the nonlatex elastics lost a larger force (p < .01). The test results suggest that latex-free elastics must be replaced more frequently than conventional latex elastics.

摘要

随着报告的乳胶过敏病例数量增加,正畸领域已引入无乳胶产品。本研究的目的是比较临床上常用的无乳胶弹力线和乳胶弹力线之间的效率。在本研究中,80根无乳胶弹力线和80根乳胶弹力线被分为4组,每组20根弹力线。使用一台经过特殊改装的机器,模拟这些弹性体产品在口腔动态过程中的拉伸,使每组弹力线暴露于不同数量的开合循环(100、1200、2400或4800次)。该机器将弹力线的内径从其原始尺寸扩展到3至5倍(这种扩展与口腔开合运动期间所经历的扩展相当)。在此之后,使用英斯特朗4301机器对弹力线进行动态拉伸试验,以评估可能的力损失和变形。使用学生t检验和Tuckey方差分析对不同的测试结果进行分析。测试结果表明,两种类型的弹力线之间存在差异,特别是在内径行为方面:无乳胶弹力线的内径增加明显。在达到2400次开合循环之前,两种类型弹力线施加的力相似。此后,无乳胶弹力线损失的力更大(p < .01)。测试结果表明,无乳胶弹力线必须比传统乳胶弹力线更频繁地更换。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验