Louisirirotchanakul Suda, Kanoksinsombat Chinda, O'Charoen Rachanee, Fongsatikul Ladda, Puapairoj Chintana, Lulitanond Viraphong, Appassakij Hatsadee, Promwong Charupon, Wasi Chantapong
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
Viral Immunol. 2006 Spring;19(1):108-14. doi: 10.1089/vim.2006.19.108.
The performance of currently available hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) commercial kits was analyzed by using a panel of 212 well-characterized plasma donors all over the country and a panel of nine recombinant HBsAg mutants containing single point or combinations of mutations between amino acid residues 124 and 147 of the "a" determinant. HBsAg commercial kits in this study were machine-based immunoassays with a one-step sandwich ELISA method using either an automatic closed system or manual system. The sensitivity of all machine-based assays evaluated with 105 HBsAg plasma panels was 100% (95% CL = 95.6-99.9%), whereas the specificity with 107 HBsAg negative plasma ranged from 99.07% to 100% (95% CL = 94.2-99.9%). The relative performance of these kits to detect the hepatitis B virus (HBV) mutant panel members of the "a" determinant was found to differ. Interestingly, any commercial kits with monoclonal antibody capture and polyclonal antibody detection (mono/poly), but not mono/mono Ab capture and detection, could pick up the common HBsAg Gly145Arg mutant either solely or in combination with other mutations within the "a" determinant. New versions of HBsAg test kits should recognize multiple HBsAg epitopes in order to detect mutant HBsAg, together with providing good analytical sensitivity and specificity, because of the importance of these assays in HBV diagnosis and in protecting the safety of the blood supply.
