• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于测量两种粘结系统与牙本质粘结强度的不同测试方法的影响。

Influence of different tests used to measure the bond strength to dentin of two adhesive systems.

作者信息

Cavalcante Larissa Maria Assad, Erhardt Maria Carolina Guilherme, Bedran-de-Castro Ana Karina Barbieri, Pimenta Luiz André Freire, Ambrosano Glaucia Maria Bovi

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry at Piracicaba, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Am J Dent. 2006 Feb;19(1):37-40.

PMID:16555656
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the behavior of two bonding systems: self-etching primer Clearfil Liner Bond 2V (CLB) and total-etch Single Bond (SB) when submitted to two bond strength tests: shear bond strength (SBS) and microtensile (MTBS).

METHODS

Flat dentin surfaces were obtained at the facial surface of extracted bovine incisors. muTBS started with adhesive application and incremental resin composite insertion. Samples were then sliced into 1 mm slabs parallel to the long axis of the tooth. Half of the specimens from each group were trimmed in order to obtain dumbbell-shaped (D) specimens with a cross-sectional area of 1 mm2, and in the other half of the group, the slabs were cut into beams (B) with a cross section of 1 mm2 area. Specimens were individually fractured on a microtensile apparatus. For SBS, crown segments were embedded in polyester resin and a flat dentin surface was exposed for bonding. After adhesive and restorative procedures were accomplished, the specimens were kept in water for 24 hours prior to bond testing. The tests were performed in a universal testing machine. MPa values were analyzed by Tukey's test (P < 0.05), two-way ANOVA (muTBS) and Student's t-test (SBS).

RESULTS

Mean values (SD) on muTBS were: SB/B: 42.6 (15.1), SB/D: 35.4 (6.8), CLB/B: 14.3 (10.3) and CLB/D: 27.0 (7.9). SBS values (SD) were: SB: 17.3 (5.6) and CLB 15.9 (7.2). Beam specimens bonded with CLB presented the lowest results. SBS did not show statistical differences between groups. The results showed that the shear bond test seemed to lack the sensitivity that is required to detect subtle differences between bonding agents or procedures.

摘要

目的

研究两种粘结系统在进行两种粘结强度测试时的表现,这两种粘结系统分别是自酸蚀底漆Clearfil Liner Bond 2V(CLB)和全酸蚀粘结剂Single Bond(SB),两种粘结强度测试分别是剪切粘结强度(SBS)和微拉伸粘结强度(MTBS)。

方法

在拔除的牛切牙唇面制备平坦的牙本质表面。微拉伸粘结强度测试从涂布粘结剂和逐层填入树脂复合材料开始。然后将样本沿牙齿长轴切成1mm厚的薄片。每组样本的一半被修整成横截面面积为1mm²的哑铃形(D)样本,另一半切成横截面面积为1mm²的小梁(B)样本。样本在微拉伸测试仪上单独折断。对于剪切粘结强度测试,将牙冠部分嵌入聚酯树脂中,暴露出平坦的牙本质表面用于粘结。完成粘结剂和修复程序后,在进行粘结测试前将样本在水中保存24小时。测试在万能材料试验机上进行。通过Tukey检验(P<0.05)、双向方差分析(微拉伸粘结强度测试)和Student t检验(剪切粘结强度测试)对MPa值进行分析。

结果

微拉伸粘结强度测试的平均值(标准差)为:SB/B:42.6(15.1),SB/D:35.4(6.8),CLB/B:14.3(10.3),CLB/D:27.0(7.9)。剪切粘结强度测试值(标准差)为:SB:17.3(5.6),CLB:15.9(7.2)。用CLB粘结的小梁样本结果最低。剪切粘结强度测试在各组之间未显示出统计学差异。结果表明,剪切粘结强度测试似乎缺乏检测粘结剂或操作之间细微差异所需的敏感性。

相似文献

1
Influence of different tests used to measure the bond strength to dentin of two adhesive systems.用于测量两种粘结系统与牙本质粘结强度的不同测试方法的影响。
Am J Dent. 2006 Feb;19(1):37-40.
2
Influence of the direction of tubules on bond strength to dentin.小管方向对牙本质粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2001 Jan-Feb;26(1):27-35.
3
Relation of enamel prism orientation to microtensile bond strength.釉质棱柱方向与微拉伸粘结强度的关系。
Am J Dent. 2002 Apr;15(2):109-13.
4
Influence of the substrate and load application method on the shear bond strength of two adhesive systems.基底和加载方式对两种粘结系统剪切粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2003 Jul-Aug;28(4):388-94.
5
Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength.粘结剂厚度与微拉伸粘结强度之间的关系。
Oper Dent. 2001 Jan-Feb;26(1):97-104.
6
Dentin bonding of an etch-and-rinse adhesive using self- and light-cured composites.使用自固化和光固化复合材料的酸蚀冲洗型粘合剂的牙本质粘结
Am J Dent. 2009 Aug;22(4):215-8.
7
Influence of differently oriented dentin surfaces and the regional variation of specimens on adhesive layer thickness and bond strength.不同取向的牙本质表面及样本的区域差异对黏结层厚度和黏结强度的影响。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2008;20(2):119-28; discussion 129. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2008.00162.x.
8
Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems.增强陶瓷上各种修复系统的树脂复合材料的粘结强度耐久性。
Dent Mater. 2009 Dec;25(12):1477-83. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.020. Epub 2009 Aug 9.
9
Effect of water storage on resin-dentin bond strengths formed by different bonding approaches.储水对不同粘结方法形成的树脂-牙本质粘结强度的影响。
Indian J Dent Res. 2009 Oct-Dec;20(4):431-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.59445.
10
Effect of dentin conditioners on the microtensile bond strength of a conventional and a self-etching primer adhesive system.牙本质调节剂对传统型和自酸蚀型底胶粘结系统微拉伸粘结强度的影响
Dent Mater. 2005 Feb;21(2):103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.12.004.