Prekker Matthew E, Nath D S, Walker A R, Johnson A C, Hertz M I, Herrington C S, Radosevich D M, Dahlberg Peter S
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435, USA.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006 Apr;25(4):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.11.436. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
A scoring system was recently proposed to grade the severity of primary graft dysfunction (PGD), a frequent early complication of lung transplantation. The purposes of this study are to: (1) validate the PGD grading system with respect to patient outcomes; and (2) compare the performance of criteria employing the arterial oxygenation to fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F) ratio to an alternative grading system employing the oxygenation index (OI).
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 402 patients having undergone lung transplantation at our institution from 1992 through 2004. The ISHLT PGD grading system was modified and grades were assigned up to 48 hours post-transplantation as follows: Grade 1 PGD, P/F > 300; Grade 2, P/F 200 to 300; and Grade 3, P/F < 200. A worst score T(0-48) was also assigned, which reflects the highest grade recorded between T0 and T48.
The prevalence of severe PGD (P/F Grade 3) declined after transplant, from 25% at T0 to 15% at T48. Grouping patients by P/F grade at T48 demonstrated the clearest differentiation of 90-day death rates (Grade 1, 7%; Grade 2, 12%; Grade 3, 33%) (p = 0.0001). T48 OI grade also differentiates 90-day death rates. There was no difference in longer-term survival between patients with PGD Grades 1 and 2. OI grade at T0 qualitatively improved differential mortality between Grades 1 and 2; however, the differences did not reach statistical significance. Patients with a worst score T(0-48) of Grade 3 PGD did have significantly decreased long-term survival, as well as longer ICU and hospital stay, when compared with Grades 1 and 2 PGD. Significant risk factors for short- and long-term mortality in our multivariate model were P/F Grade 3 [worst score T(0-48) as well as T0 grade], single-lung transplant, use of cardiopulmonary bypass and high pre-operative mean pulmonary artery pressure.
There is an increased risk of short- and long-term mortality and length of hospital stay associated with severe (Grade 3) PGD. The proposed ISHLT grading system can rapidly identify patients with poor outcomes who may benefit from early, aggressive treatment. Refinement of the scoring system may further improve patient risk stratification.
最近有人提出一种评分系统,用于对肺移植常见的早期并发症——原发性移植肺功能障碍(PGD)的严重程度进行分级。本研究的目的是:(1)根据患者预后验证PGD分级系统;(2)比较采用动脉血氧分压与吸入氧分数比(P/F)的标准与采用氧合指数(OI)的另一种分级系统的性能。
我们回顾性分析了1992年至2004年在我院接受肺移植的402例患者的病历。对国际心脏和肺移植协会(ISHLT)的PGD分级系统进行了修改,并在移植后48小时内进行分级,具体如下:1级PGD,P/F>300;2级,P/F为200至300;3级,P/F<200。还给出了最差评分T(0 - 48),它反映了T0至T48之间记录的最高分级。
移植后重度PGD(P/F 3级)的发生率下降,从T0时的25%降至T48时的15%。按T48时的P/F分级对患者进行分组,90天死亡率的差异最为明显(1级,7%;2级,12%;3级,33%)(p = 0.0001)。T48时的OI分级也能区分90天死亡率。PGD 1级和2级患者的长期生存率无差异。T0时的OI分级在定性上改善了1级和2级之间的死亡率差异;然而,差异未达到统计学意义。与PGD 1级和2级相比,最差评分T(0 - 48)为3级PGD的患者长期生存率显著降低,ICU和住院时间也更长。在我们的多变量模型中,短期和长期死亡率的显著危险因素为P/F 3级[最差评分T(0 - 48)以及T0分级]、单肺移植、使用体外循环和术前平均肺动脉压较高。
重度(3级)PGD与短期和长期死亡率增加以及住院时间延长相关。所提出的ISHLT分级系统可以快速识别预后不良的患者,这些患者可能从早期积极治疗中获益。对评分系统的完善可能会进一步改善患者的风险分层。