• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预先授权政策的早期或晚期实施对环氧化酶-2(Cox II)抑制剂使用的差异影响。

Differential effect of early or late implementation of prior authorization policies on the use of Cox II inhibitors.

作者信息

Roughead Elizabeth E, Zhang Fang, Ross-Degnan Dennis, Soumerai Stephen

机构信息

Sansom Institute, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Med Care. 2006 Apr;44(4):378-82. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000204056.31664.36.

DOI:10.1097/01.mlr.0000204056.31664.36
PMID:16565640
Abstract

BACKGROUND

State Medicaid programs introduce many types of prescribing restrictions to manage pharmaceutical use and expenditure. Little is known about the differential effect of implementing prior authorization (PA) policies at market entry versus waiting until several years later when prescribing behavior may already be established.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to examine the impact on overall use of Cox II inhibitors of PA policies implemented at market entry versus at least 2 years after market entry.

RESEARCH DESIGN

We quantified Cox II inhibitor and nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) utilization for state Medicaid programs from January 1996 to September 2003. We used generalized estimating equations, Tukey's studentized range test and segmented linear regression on state Medicaid programs to determine the significance of changes in medication use.

MEASURES

The primary end point was the number of defined daily doses (DDD) per 1000 population per day.

RESULTS

Six states implementing prescribing restrictions for Cox II inhibitors at market entry had the lowest rates of uptake, averaging 10.9 DDD/1000/d. Twelve states adopting restrictions more than 2 years after market entry experienced declines in use from 23.0 DDD/1000/d before to 13.9 DDD/1000/d after the restrictions (P < 0.01). The 17 states that had never restricted access had the highest utilization, averaging 29.0 DDD/1000/d.

CONCLUSION

Implementing prescribing restrictions at market entry of Cox II inhibitors was effective in restricting uptake. Despite the difficulty in changing well-established prescribing patterns, utilization in states implementing policies 2 years after market entry approached that of the early adopting states within 1 year. Clinical outcomes of such policies remain unknown.

摘要

背景

州医疗补助计划引入了多种处方限制措施,以管理药品使用和支出。对于在药品进入市场时实施预先授权(PA)政策与等到几年后处方行为可能已经确立时再实施的差异影响,我们知之甚少。

目的

我们试图研究在药品进入市场时与进入市场至少2年后实施PA政策对Cox II抑制剂总体使用情况的影响。

研究设计

我们对1996年1月至2003年9月期间州医疗补助计划中Cox II抑制剂和非选择性非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)的使用情况进行了量化。我们使用广义估计方程、Tukey的学生化极差检验和对州医疗补助计划的分段线性回归来确定药物使用变化的显著性。

测量指标

主要终点是每1000人口每天的限定日剂量(DDD)数。

结果

在药品进入市场时对Cox II抑制剂实施处方限制的6个州的采用率最低,平均为10.9 DDD/1000/天。在药品进入市场2年多后采取限制措施的12个州,使用量从限制前的23.0 DDD/1000/天下降到限制后的13.9 DDD/1000/天(P < 0.01)。从未限制使用的17个州的使用率最高,平均为29.0 DDD/1000/天。

结论

在Cox II抑制剂进入市场时实施处方限制有效地限制了采用率。尽管改变既定的处方模式存在困难,但在药品进入市场2年后实施政策的州,其使用率在1年内接近早期采用该政策的州。此类政策的临床结果尚不清楚。

相似文献

1
Differential effect of early or late implementation of prior authorization policies on the use of Cox II inhibitors.预先授权政策的早期或晚期实施对环氧化酶-2(Cox II)抑制剂使用的差异影响。
Med Care. 2006 Apr;44(4):378-82. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000204056.31664.36.
2
Medicaid prior-authorization programs and the use of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors.医疗补助预先授权计划与环氧化酶-2抑制剂的使用
N Engl J Med. 2004 Nov 18;351(21):2187-94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa042770.
3
Impact of Medicaid prior authorization requirement for COX-2 inhibitor drugs in Nebraska.内布拉斯加州对COX-2抑制剂药物的医疗补助事先授权要求的影响
Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb;43(1 Pt 2):435-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00766.x.
4
Prior authorization policies for selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in Medicaid: a policy review.医疗补助中选择性环氧化酶-2抑制剂的预先授权政策:一项政策审查
Med Care. 2006 Jul;44(7):658-63. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000218775.04675.fd.
5
Effects of a prior-authorization policy for celecoxib on medical service and prescription drug use in a managed care Medicaid population.塞来昔布预先授权政策对管理式医疗医疗补助人群医疗服务及处方药使用的影响。
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1518-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.013.
6
Differences in the cost of antidepressants across state Medicaid programs.各州医疗补助计划中抗抑郁药物成本的差异。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2008 Mar;11(1):33-47.
7
Gastroprotective drugs in Australia: utilization patterns between 1997 and 2006 in relation to NSAID prescribing.澳大利亚的胃保护药物:1997年至2006年期间与非甾体抗炎药处方相关的使用模式
Clin Ther. 2009 Apr;31(4):849-61. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.04.012.
8
Evaluation of an automated system for prior authorization: a COX-2 inhibitor example.
Am J Manag Care. 2006 Sep;12(9):501-8.
9
Prescribing of COX-2 inhibitors in Germany after safety warnings and market withdrawals.德国在发出安全警告及产品撤市后COX-2抑制剂的处方情况
Pharmazie. 2006 Oct;61(10):878-86.
10
What happened to the prescribing of other COX-2 inhibitors, paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs when rofecoxib was withdrawn in Australia?当罗非昔布在澳大利亚被撤市时,其他环氧化酶-2抑制剂、对乙酰氨基酚和非甾体抗炎药的处方情况如何?
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Nov;16(11):1184-91. doi: 10.1002/pds.1451.

引用本文的文献

1
Medicare Part D plan generosity and medication use among dual-eligible nursing home residents.医疗保险 D 部分计划的慷慨程度与护理院居民的药物使用情况。
Med Care. 2013 Oct;51(10):894-900. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829fafdc.
2
Pharmaceutical policies: effects of restrictions on reimbursement.药品政策:报销限制的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Aug 4;2010(8):CD008654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008654.
3
Impact of two Medicaid prior-authorization policies on antihypertensive use and costs among Michigan and Indiana residents dually enrolled in Medicaid and Medicare: results of a longitudinal, population-based study.
密歇根州和印第安纳州同时参加医疗补助和医疗保险的居民中,两项医疗补助事先授权政策对降压药使用和成本的影响:一项基于人群的纵向研究结果。
Clin Ther. 2010 Apr;32(4):729-41; discussion 716. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.04.007.
4
Unintended impacts of a Medicaid prior authorization policy on access to medications for bipolar illness.医疗补助事先授权政策对双相情感障碍药物获得的意外影响。
Med Care. 2010 Jan;48(1):4-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181bd4c10.
5
Prior authorization for biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a description of US Medicaid programs.生物性抗风湿药物的预先授权:美国医疗补助计划的描述
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Nov 15;59(11):1611-7. doi: 10.1002/art.24191.
6
Potential savings from an evidence-based consumer-oriented public education campaign on prescription drugs.基于证据的面向消费者的处方药公共教育活动的潜在节省。
Health Serv Res. 2008 Oct;43(5 Pt 1):1557-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00858.x. Epub 2008 May 13.
7
Impact of pharmaceutical prior authorisation policies : a systematic review of the literature.药品预先授权政策的影响:文献系统评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(8):637-48. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725080-00002.
8
Prescription drug cost sharing: associations with medication and medical utilization and spending and health.处方药费用分担:与药物使用、医疗利用、支出及健康的关联
JAMA. 2007 Jul 4;298(1):61-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.1.61.