• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超重和肥胖患者的机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients.

作者信息

Mikhail Albert A, Stockton Benjamin R, Orvieto Marcelo A, Chien Gary W, Gong Edward M, Zorn Kevin C, Brendler Charles B, Zagaja Gregory P, Shalhav Arieh L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.

出版信息

Urology. 2006 Apr;67(4):774-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.10.049. Epub 2006 Mar 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2005.10.049
PMID:16566979
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess outcomes of robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RLRP) in overweight and obese patients, defined as those with a body mass index (BMI) of 25 to 30 kg/m2 and greater than 30 kg/m2, respectively.

METHODS

This was a nonrandomized study evaluating all of our RLRP patients. Patients were divided into three groups: BMI of 25 kg/m2 or less (group 1), BMI greater than 25 kg/m2 and less than 30 kg/m2 (group 2), and BMI of 30 kg/m2 or more (group 3). Patients were evaluated prospectively with the validated Rand 36-Item Health Survey (version 2) and with the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index questionnaire.

RESULTS

Between February 2003 and November 2004, 150 RLRPs were performed at our center. Average follow-up was 8 months. Groups 1, 2, and 3 had 39, 65, and 46 patients, respectively. Average BMIs for all three groups were statistically different (P < 0.01). When compared with group 1, open conversion rates, hospital stay, positive margin, and complication rates were not statistically different for groups 2 or 3. Operative time (P < 0.004) and estimated blood loss (P < 0.03), however, were statistically greater for group 3 compared with group 1. Transfusion rate was highest in group 2 (P = 0.04 compared with group 1). Prostate weights were also statistically greater in groups 2 (P = 0.003) and 3 (P = 0.02) compared with group 1. Overall, BMI did not increase perioperative and postoperative morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is safe in overweight and obese patients and might be the surgical management of choice in this subset of patients. Further long-term follow-up with more patients is required to verify this initial observation.

摘要

目的

评估机器人腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RLRP)应用于超重和肥胖患者(分别定义为体重指数[BMI]为25至30kg/m²以及大于30kg/m²的患者)的疗效。

方法

这是一项评估我们所有RLRP患者的非随机研究。患者被分为三组:BMI为25kg/m² 或更低(第1组)、BMI大于25kg/m² 且小于30kg/m²(第2组)以及BMI为30kg/m² 或更高(第3组)。采用经过验证的兰德36项健康调查(第2版)和加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校前列腺癌指数问卷对患者进行前瞻性评估。

结果

在2003年2月至2004年11月期间,我们中心进行了150例RLRP手术。平均随访时间为8个月。第1、2和3组分别有39、65和46例患者。所有三组的平均BMI在统计学上存在差异(P<0.01)。与第1组相比,第2组或第3组的开放手术转换率、住院时间、切缘阳性率和并发症发生率在统计学上无差异。然而,与第1组相比,第3组的手术时间(P<0.004)和估计失血量(P<0.03)在统计学上显著更高。第2组的输血率最高(与第1组相比,P = 0.04)。与第1组相比,第2组(P = 0.003)和第3组(P = 0.02)的前列腺重量在统计学上也更大。总体而言,BMI并未增加围手术期和术后发病率。

结论

机器人腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术在超重和肥胖患者中是安全的,可能是这类患者的手术治疗选择。需要对更多患者进行进一步的长期随访以验证这一初步观察结果。

相似文献

1
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients.超重和肥胖患者的机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术
Urology. 2006 Apr;67(4):774-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.10.049. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
2
Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.前列腺重量对机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术手术及术后结果的影响。
Urology. 2007 Feb;69(2):300-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.021.
3
Impact of prostate size and body mass index on perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.前列腺大小和体重指数对腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后围手术期发病率的影响。
J Urol. 2005 Feb;173(2):552-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000150101.95236.35.
4
Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes.超重和肥胖患者的机器人根治性前列腺切除术:肿瘤学及经验证的功能结果
Urology. 2009 Feb;73(2):316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.493. Epub 2008 Oct 26.
5
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 100 patients with one year of follow-up.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术:首批100例患者的一年随访
Urology. 2006 Dec;68(6):1275-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1060.
6
Impact of obesity on clinical outcomes in robotic prostatectomy.肥胖对机器人前列腺切除术临床结局的影响。
Urology. 2005 Apr;65(4):740-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.10.061.
7
A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与单纯腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的直接比较:单机构经验
J Urol. 2007 Aug;178(2):478-82. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.111. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
8
Does obesity influence the operative course or complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.肥胖是否会影响机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术的手术过程或并发症?
BJU Int. 2006 Dec;98(6):1275-8; discussion 1278. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06488.x.
9
A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术中阳性手术切缘的发生率及位置比较。
J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
10
Prospective evaluation of short-term impact and recovery of health related quality of life in men undergoing robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术对男性健康相关生活质量的短期影响及恢复的前瞻性评估。
J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):854-8; discussion 859. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.05.051. Epub 2007 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes in obese patients undergoing Da Vinci robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.达芬奇机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗肥胖患者的围手术期、功能和肿瘤学结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2024 Sep 23;24(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01595-5.
2
BMI Impact on Readmissions for Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Monocentric, Single-Surgeon Serial Analysis of 500 Cases.体重指数对接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者再入院率的影响:一项针对500例病例的单中心、单外科医生的系列分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 7;12(12):3908. doi: 10.3390/jcm12123908.
3
Latest Evidence on Post-Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence.
前列腺切除术后尿失禁的最新证据
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 2;12(3):1190. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031190.
4
Robotic prostatectomy after abandoned open radical prostatectomy-Technical aspects and outcomes.开放根治性前列腺切除术失败后行机器人前列腺切除术——技术要点与结果
BJUI Compass. 2020 Aug 30;1(5):174-179. doi: 10.1002/bco2.34. eCollection 2020 Nov.
5
Effect of prostate and bony pelvic dimensions measured by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.术前磁共振成像测量的前列腺和骨性骨盆尺寸对机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的影响。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Dec;16(6):1483-1489. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01402-z. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
6
Associations of fat and muscle mass with overall survival in men with prostate cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis.脂肪和肌肉质量与前列腺癌男性患者总生存的相关性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022 Apr;25(4):615-626. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00442-0. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
7
Recommendations on robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a Brazilian experts' consensus.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术推荐意见:巴西专家共识
J Robot Surg. 2021 Dec;15(6):829-839. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01186-0. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
8
Predictors of Prolonged Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy and the Creation of a Scoring System for the Duration.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术时间延长的预测因素及手术时长评分系统的建立
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Sep 4;12:8005-8014. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S265480. eCollection 2020.
9
Morbid obesity is adversely associated with perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.病态肥胖与接受机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术患者的围手术期结局存在不良关联。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Nov;14(11):E574-E581. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6389.
10
Robotic radical prostatectomy after aborted prostatectomy: still feasible? The experience from a tertiary care center.前列腺切除术失败后行机器人根治性前列腺切除术:仍然可行吗?来自一家三级医疗中心的经验。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Jun;13(3):407-412. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0870-x. Epub 2018 Aug 29.