Robinson C M, Khan L A K, Akhtar M A
The Shoulder Injury Clinic, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh EH16 4SU, UK.
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Apr;88(4):502-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B4.17195.
Over a seven-year period we treated a consecutive series of 58 patients, 20 men and 38 women with a mean age of 66 years (21 to 87) who had an acute complex anterior fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus. Two patterns of injury are proposed for study based upon a prospective assessment of the pattern of soft-tissue and bony injury and the degree of devascularisation of the humeral head. In 23 patients, the head had retained capsular attachments and arterial back-bleeding (type-I injury), whereas in 35 patients the head was devoid of significant soft-tissue attachments with no active arterial bleeding (type-II injury). Following treatment by open reduction and internal fixation, only two of 23 patients with type-I injuries developed radiological evidence of osteonecrosis of the humeral head, compared with four of seven patients with type-II injuries. A policy of primary treatment by open reduction and internal fixation of type-I injuries is justified, whereas most elderly patients (aged 60 years or over) with type-II injuries are best treated by hemiarthroplasty. The best treatment for younger patients (aged under 60 years) who sustain type-II injuries is controversial and an individualised approach to their management is advocated.
在七年的时间里,我们连续治疗了58例患者,其中男性20例,女性38例,平均年龄66岁(21至87岁),均为肱骨近端急性复杂骨折脱位。基于对软组织和骨损伤模式以及肱骨头血运障碍程度的前瞻性评估,提出两种损伤模式进行研究。23例患者中,肱骨头保留了关节囊附着且有动脉回血(I型损伤),而35例患者中,肱骨头没有明显的软组织附着且无活动性动脉出血(II型损伤)。在切开复位内固定治疗后,23例I型损伤患者中只有2例出现肱骨头坏死的影像学证据,而7例II型损伤患者中有4例出现。I型损伤采用切开复位内固定的一期治疗策略是合理的,而大多数II型损伤的老年患者(60岁及以上)最好采用半关节置换术治疗。对于发生II型损伤的年轻患者(60岁以下),最佳治疗方法存在争议,主张采用个体化的治疗方法。