Suppr超能文献

基于药物的疾病负担指数的开发与验证

Development and validation of the medication-based disease burden index.

作者信息

George Johnson, Vuong Tam, Bailey Michael J, Kong David Cm, Marriott Jennifer L, Stewart Kay

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Victorian College of Pharmacy, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Apr;40(4):645-50. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G204. Epub 2006 Mar 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medication lists offer an alternative source of data on comorbidities and disease burden.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate the Medication-Based Disease Burden Index (MDBI).

METHODS

A list of medications corresponding to the leading causes of global death was pilot tested and finalized by an expert panel. The resulting index was tested on drug regimens of patients at risk of medication misadventure. Criterion validity of the index was established against Charlson's index and Chronic Disease Score (CDS). Sensitivity, specificity, predictive validity, convergent and discriminant validity, and interrater and test-retest reliabilities of the index were also assessed.

RESULTS

The MDBI consisting of specific medications for 20 chronic medical conditions and corresponding disability weightings was developed. The MDBI was tested on 317 patients with mean +/- SD Charlson's index scores of 2.8 +/- 2.2 and CDS scores of 7.3 +/- 2.8. Mean MDBI scores (0.33 +/- 0.28) demonstrated significant correlations with Charlson's index scores (r = 0.31; p < 0.001) and CDS (r = 0.53; p < 0.001). MDBI had satisfactory sensitivity and high specificity. Age of the patients and number of medications had significant correlation with the MDBI scores, but the MDBI scores were not significantly different in males and females. MDBI scores could successfully predict death and planned or unplanned readmissions (OR = 4.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 15.5; p = 0.01). MDBI demonstrated high inter-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.99) and test-retest reliabilities (ICC = 0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Initial testing suggests that MDBI could offer an alternative low-cost and convenient method for quantifying disease burden and predicting health outcomes.

摘要

背景

用药清单提供了有关合并症和疾病负担的数据的另一种来源。

目的

开发并验证基于用药的疾病负担指数(MDBI)。

方法

由一个专家小组对与全球主要死因相对应的药物清单进行预试验并最终确定。所得指数在有用药差错风险的患者的药物治疗方案上进行测试。该指数的标准效度是根据查尔森指数和慢性病评分(CDS)确定的。还评估了该指数的敏感性、特异性、预测效度、收敛效度和区分效度,以及评分者间信度和重测信度。

结果

开发了由针对20种慢性疾病的特定药物和相应残疾权重组成的MDBI。在317例患者身上对MDBI进行了测试,这些患者的查尔森指数平均得分±标准差为2.8±2.2,CDS评分为7.3±2.8。MDBI平均得分(0.33±0.28)与查尔森指数得分(r = 0.31;p < 0.001)和CDS(r = 0.53;p < 0.001)显示出显著相关性。MDBI具有令人满意的敏感性和高特异性。患者年龄和用药数量与MDBI得分有显著相关性,但MDBI得分在男性和女性中无显著差异。MDBI得分能够成功预测死亡以及计划内或计划外再次入院(OR = 4.7,95%CI 1.4至15.5;p = 0.01)。MDBI显示出较高的评分者间信度(组内相关系数[ICC] = 0.99)和重测信度(ICC = 0.98)。

结论

初步测试表明,MDBI可为量化疾病负担和预测健康结局提供一种低成本且便捷的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验