Diel R, Nienhaus A, Lange C, Schaberg T
School of Public Health, c/o Institute for Medical Sociology, Heinrich Heine University, P.O. box 101007, D-40001 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Eur Respir J. 2006 Jul;28(1):35-44. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00011806. Epub 2006 Mar 29.
The aim of the present study was to perform cost-minimisation analysis of contact investigation from a public health perspective using the tuberculin skin test (TST) and a new blood assay, QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-G). A decision-analysis model simulated the costs of investigating a cohort of adult close tuberculosis contacts by the public health service following the current German guidelines over a period of 2 yrs. The economic outcomes were compared with alternative screening strategies. These were: 1) QFT-G instead of TST; 2) TST followed by QFT-G; and 3) TST followed by QFT-G in vaccinated (bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG)) subjects. In a base-case analysis, the costs of TST-based screening were 91.06 Euros (EUR).contact(-1), assuming a 1% tuberculosis-case-finding incidence. The least expensive strategy was TST screening plus subsequent QFT-G testing (52.05 EUR), resulting in a 43% cost reduction. Using QFT-G alone in BCG-vaccinated subjects who tested positive in the TST led to a 39% cost reduction. The savings using QFT-G alone instead of TST amounted to 29.77 EUR.contact(-1). The results depended on the acquisition costs assumed and the proportion of positive results in TST-based screening. Screening for tuberculosis by combining tuberculin skin testing and QuantiFERON-TB Gold markedly reduces public health costs compared with tuberculin skin test screening alone.
本研究的目的是从公共卫生角度,使用结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)和一种新的血液检测方法——结核感染T细胞检测(QFT-G),对接触者调查进行成本最小化分析。一个决策分析模型模拟了公共卫生服务机构按照当前德国指南,对一组成年结核病密切接触者进行为期2年调查的成本。将这些经济结果与替代筛查策略进行比较。这些策略包括:1)用QFT-G替代TST;2)先进行TST,然后进行QFT-G检测;3)在接种过卡介苗(BCG)的受试者中,先进行TST,然后进行QFT-G检测。在一项基础案例分析中,假设结核病发现率为1%,基于TST筛查的成本为91.06欧元/接触者。成本最低的策略是TST筛查加后续QFT-G检测(52.05欧元),成本降低了43%。在TST检测呈阳性的接种BCG的受试者中单独使用QFT-G,成本降低了39%。单独使用QFT-G而非TST节省的成本为29.77欧元/接触者。结果取决于假设的购置成本以及基于TST筛查的阳性结果比例。与单独进行结核菌素皮肤试验筛查相比,联合使用结核菌素皮肤试验和结核感染T细胞检测进行结核病筛查可显著降低公共卫生成本。