Weiss Kevin, Buxton Martin, Andersson Fredrik L, Lamm Carl-Johan, Liljas Bengt, Sullivan Sean D
Institute for Health Studies, Midwest Center for Health Services and Policy Research, Hines, VA, USA.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2006 May;17 Suppl 17:21-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-5562.2006.00381.x.
The inhaled Steroid Treatment As Regular Therapy in early asthma (START) study has shown that early intervention with inhaled budesonide in mild persistent asthma improves clinical outcomes in both adults and children. The aim of this study was to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of early treatment with budesonide Turbuhaler in children aged 5-10 yr who participated in START. Direct and indirect costs associated with asthma were determined for 1974 children participating in the double-blind, 3-year part of the study. Randomization was to placebo or to budesonide 200 microg once daily in each case in addition to usual asthma care. Cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated from the healthcare payer's and societal perspectives (using US prices). The addition of once-daily budesonide therapy to usual asthma care was associated with 16 additional symptom-free days (SFDs) per child over the 3-yr period (p < 0.001), with a substantial reduction (50%) in the mean number of days spent in hospital, and with reduced frequency of emergency room visits and missed school and caregiver work days. From the healthcare payer's perspective (direct costs), the increase in mean direct cost over 3 yr with budesonide was 169 dollars, which translated into an incremental cost of early intervention with budesonide in children of 10.50 dollars (95% CI 1.20-33.30 dollars) per SFD gained. From the societal perspective, there was a cost reduction over 3 yr of 192 dollars with budesonide relative to placebo. From a societal perspective, budesonide was therefore dominant. In conclusion, early intervention with once-daily budesonide added to usual asthma care in children with mild persistent asthma is cost-saving from a societal perspective and is acceptably cost-effective when viewed from a healthcare payer perspective.
吸入性糖皮质激素作为早期哮喘常规治疗(START)研究表明,在轻度持续性哮喘中早期使用吸入布地奈德进行干预可改善成人和儿童的临床结局。本研究旨在评估参与START研究的5至10岁儿童早期使用布地奈德都保治疗的增量成本效益。确定了参与该研究双盲3年部分的1974名儿童与哮喘相关的直接和间接成本。除常规哮喘护理外,随机分为安慰剂组或布地奈德200微克每日一次组。从医疗保健支付者和社会角度(使用美国价格)计算成本效益比。在常规哮喘护理基础上加用每日一次布地奈德治疗,在3年期间每个儿童额外有16个无症状天数(SFDs)(p<0.001),住院天数平均大幅减少(50%),急诊就诊频率、缺课天数和照顾者误工天数减少。从医疗保健支付者角度(直接成本)来看,使用布地奈德3年期间平均直接成本增加169美元,这意味着每获得一个SFD,儿童早期使用布地奈德进行干预的增量成本为10.50美元(95%CI 1.20 - 33.30美元)。从社会角度来看,与安慰剂相比,使用布地奈德3年成本降低192美元。因此,从社会角度来看,布地奈德占主导地位。总之,在轻度持续性哮喘儿童的常规哮喘护理基础上加用每日一次布地奈德进行早期干预,从社会角度来看可节省成本,从医疗保健支付者角度来看成本效益也可接受。