Hawkins Carolyn, Gatenby Paul, Tuck Roger, Danta Gytis, Andrews Colin
Department of Clinical Immunology, The Canberra Hospital, Garran, Australia.
J Autoimmune Dis. 2006 Mar 30;3:3. doi: 10.1186/1740-2557-3-3.
Neurological syndromes occur in a significant number of patients with antiphospholipid antibodies. The optimal management for these patients however remains uncertain. Our study is a descriptive analysis looking retrospectively at 45 patients who presented to the principal tertiary referral centre in the Australian Capital Territory, with either cerebral arterial or venous thrombosis for which there was no obvious cause for their presentation when initially reviewed. The diagnosis was based on the clinical findings made by one of three neurologists attached to our centre. Radiological findings and the presence of either IgM or IgG anticardiolipin antibodies, IgG anti-beta-2 glycoprotein 1 antibodies or a lupus anticoagulant were then documented. In this group of patients three subgroups were identified:1. Individuals that fulfilled the Sapporo Classification Criteria2. Individuals with transiently positive antiphospholipid antibodies and3. Individuals with persistently low positive antiphospholipid antibodies. The most interesting of these three groups are those individuals with transiently positive antiphospholipid antibodies. A potential cause for presentation was identified in only one patient of this group with documented infective endocarditis and bacteraemia. Comparison with the other two groups suggested that there was little in terms of clinical presentation, radiological findings or intercurrent risk factors for thrombotic disease to distinguish between them. With disappearance of antiphospholipid antibodies, the individuals within this group have not had further thrombotic events. Our observations emphasise the problems that continue to exist in relation to the occurrence of cerebrovascular disease in the context of antiphospholipid antibodies and the optimal management of these stratified groups. Our findings also raise an as yet unanswered question as to the signficance of these transiently positive antiphospholipid antibodies. In the absence of significant intercurrent risk factors our findings would suggest that in the group we describe that they are likely to be of clinical significance.
大量抗磷脂抗体患者会出现神经综合征。然而,这些患者的最佳治疗方案仍不明确。我们的研究是一项描述性分析,回顾性研究了45例就诊于澳大利亚首都地区主要三级转诊中心的患者,这些患者患有脑动脉或静脉血栓形成,在最初检查时其发病没有明显原因。诊断基于我们中心三名神经科医生之一做出的临床诊断。然后记录放射学检查结果以及IgM或IgG抗心磷脂抗体、IgG抗β2糖蛋白1抗体或狼疮抗凝物的存在情况。在这组患者中,确定了三个亚组:1. 符合札幌分类标准的个体;2. 抗磷脂抗体短暂阳性的个体;3. 抗磷脂抗体持续低阳性的个体。这三组中最有趣的是抗磷脂抗体短暂阳性的个体。在该组中,只有一名记录有感染性心内膜炎和菌血症的患者确定了一个可能的发病原因。与其他两组相比,在临床表现、放射学检查结果或血栓形成疾病的并发危险因素方面,几乎没有什么可以区分它们。随着抗磷脂抗体的消失,该组个体未再发生血栓事件。我们的观察结果强调了在抗磷脂抗体背景下脑血管疾病的发生以及这些分层组的最佳治疗方面仍然存在的问题。我们的研究结果还提出了一个尚未得到解答的问题,即这些短暂阳性的抗磷脂抗体的意义。在没有显著并发危险因素的情况下,我们的研究结果表明,在我们描述的这组患者中,它们可能具有临床意义。