Ferretti A, Giampiccolo P, Redolfi S, Mondini S, Cirignotta F, Cavalli A, Tantucci C
Division of Pneumology, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Respir Res. 2006 Mar 30;7(1):54. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-7-54.
The ability of negative expiratory pressure (NEP) technique to differentiate between awake snorers with and without obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea (OSAH) was investigated.
Forty-eight subjects with sleep disordered breathing (SDB) and 7 healthy subjects, as non-snorer controls, underwent the NEP application of -5 and -7 cmH2O in the seated and supine position during wakefulness, after performing a sleep study. The upper airway collapsibility was assessed by computing the volume exhaled during the first 0.5 sec. (V,NEP0.5) and 1 sec. (V,NEP1) following the NEP start.
Patients with severe (AHI > or = 30) (n = 19) and mild-to-moderate (AHI <30 and >5) (n = 15) OSAH had lower V,NEP0.5 (340 +/- 88 ml) as compared to snorers (AHI < or = 5) (n = 14) (427 +/- 101 ml; p < 0.01) and controls (n = 7) (492 +/- 69 ml; p < 0.001) in the supine position with NEP -5 cmH2O. Less significant differences among the different groups were observed for V,NEP0.5 in the seated position with NEP -5 cmH2O and in both positions with NEP -7 cmH2O (only OSAH patients vs controls, p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained for V,NEP1 in either position by using both NEP -5 cmH2O and -7 cmH2O. In spite of this, a substantial overlapping of V,NEP0.5 and V,NEP1 between snorers and OSAH patients did not allow to identify a reliable diagnostic cut-off level. An inverse correlation with AHI was found for V,NEP0.5 in the supine position with NEP -5 cmH2O (rs = -0.46, p < 0.05) in severe OSAH patients.
The awake OSAH patients exhibit values of V,NEP0.5 and V,NEP1 lesser than those of awake snorers. The NEP technique, however, appears to have a limited usefulness as clinical tool for routine screening of the OSAH patients during wakefulness.
研究了呼气负压(NEP)技术区分患有和未患有阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气(OSAH)的清醒打鼾者的能力。
48名睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)患者和7名健康受试者作为非打鼾对照,在进行睡眠研究后,于清醒状态下在坐位和仰卧位接受-5和-7 cmH₂O的NEP应用。通过计算NEP开始后最初0.5秒(V,NEP0.5)和1秒(V,NEP1)内呼出的气量来评估上气道可塌陷性。
重度(呼吸暂停低通气指数[AHI]≥30)(n = 19)和轻度至中度(AHI<30且>5)(n = 15)OSAH患者在仰卧位使用NEP -5 cmH₂O时的V,NEP0.5(340±88 ml)低于打鼾者(AHI≤5)(n = 14)(427±101 ml;p<0.01)和对照(n = 7)(492±69 ml;p<0.001)。在坐位使用NEP -5 cmH₂O以及在两个体位使用NEP -7 cmH₂O时,不同组之间V,NEP0.5的差异较小(仅OSAH患者与对照相比,p<0.001)。使用NEP -5 cmH₂O和-7 cmH₂O在任一位置对V,NEP1均得到类似结果。尽管如此,打鼾者与OSAH患者之间V,NEP0.5和V,NEP1存在大量重叠,无法确定可靠的诊断临界值。在重度OSAH患者中,仰卧位使用NEP -5 cmH₂O时V,NEP0.5与AHI呈负相关(rs = -0.46,p<0.05)。
清醒的OSAH患者的V,NEP0.5和V,NEP1值低于清醒的打鼾者。然而,NEP技术作为在清醒状态下对OSAH患者进行常规筛查的临床工具,其有用性似乎有限。