Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain.
Sleep. 2011 Jun 1;34(6):717-24. doi: 10.5665/SLEEP.1034.
Upper airway (UA) collapsibility is a major factor in the pathophysiology of sleep disordered breathing (SDB). We hypothesized that the negative expiratory pressure (NEP) technique could distinguish between normal children and children with SDB even during wakefulness.
During wakefulness, NEP of -5 and -10 cm H(2)O was applied during expiration in seated and supine positions. UA muscle activity (EMG) was measured using intra-oral electrodes.
Sleep laboratory.
Twenty children with snoring, 20 with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), and 20 controls.
The ratio of the area under the expiratory flow-volume curve during NEP compared to tidal breathing (RatioNEP) was calculated. Similarly, EMG area under the curve during NEP as a ratio of baseline was measured (RatioEMG). There were significant differences in RatioNEP between controls and snorers and controls and OSAS, at both pressures, in both the seated and supine positions; P < 0.0001 for all (e.g., RatioNEP at -5 cm H(2)O, seated: 1.8 ± 0.5, 2.1 ± 0.4, and 3.0 ± 0.6 for OSAS, snorers, and controls, respectively). However, no significant differences were found between snorers and OSAS. For RatioEMG, no significant differences were found between groups.
RatioNEP distinguishes between normal children and children with SDB, be it snoring or OSAS, indicating that these children have a more collapsible UA even during wakefulness. However, it does not differentiate between snorers and OSAS, highlighting the important role of UA muscle activity during sleep. NEP technique does not elicit a different UA muscle activity response between controls and children with SDB.
上呼吸道(UA) collapsibility 是睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)病理生理学的主要因素。我们假设,即使在清醒状态下,负压(NEP)技术也可以区分正常儿童和 SDB 儿童。
在清醒状态下,在坐姿和仰卧位时,在呼气时施加-5 和-10 cm H₂O 的 NEP。使用口腔内电极测量 UA 肌肉活动(EMG)。
睡眠实验室。
20 名打鼾儿童、20 名阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)儿童和 20 名对照儿童。
计算呼气流量容积曲线下面积与潮气量呼吸比值(RatioNEP)。同样,测量 NEP 期间 EMG 曲线下面积与基线的比值(RatioEMG)。在坐姿和仰卧位的两种压力下,对照组与打鼾组和对照组与 OSAS 组之间的 RatioNEP 存在显著差异;所有差异均有统计学意义(例如,在 -5 cm H₂O 时,坐姿:OSAS、打鼾和对照组的 RatioNEP 分别为 1.8 ± 0.5、2.1 ± 0.4 和 3.0 ± 0.6)。然而,打鼾组和 OSAS 组之间无显著差异。对于 RatioEMG,组间无显著差异。
RatioNEP 可区分正常儿童和 SDB 儿童,无论是打鼾还是 OSAS,表明这些儿童即使在清醒状态下,UA 也更易塌陷。然而,它不能区分打鼾和 OSAS,强调了 UA 肌肉活动在睡眠中的重要作用。NEP 技术不能引起对照组和 SDB 儿童之间的 UA 肌肉活动反应不同。