Suppr超能文献

额颞叶痴呆和阿尔茨海默病中画钟测试的定量与定性分析。

Quantitative and qualitative analyses of clock drawing in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

作者信息

Blair Mervin, Kertesz Andrew, McMonagle Paul, Davidson Wilda, Bodi Nikoletta

机构信息

Department of Cognitive Neurology, St. Joseph's Health Care, 268 Grosvenor Street, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 4V2.

出版信息

J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006 Mar;12(2):159-65. doi: 10.1017/S1355617706060255.

Abstract

The clock drawing test (CDT) is a widely used cognitive screening test. It is useful in identifying focal lesions and cognitive deficits in dementia groups. Lately, several studies attempted its use to differentiate between dementia subtypes. Although many studies have examined the CDT in dementia populations, research into the use of clock drawing in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is limited. We examined quantitative (global) and qualitative (specific error type) differences on the CDT between FTD (n = 36) and Alzheimer's disease (AD; n = 25) patients and controls without dementia (n = 25). Results showed significantly lower overall scores in the dementia groups compared to the control group, whereas FTD patients scored significantly higher than the AD group. On qualitative analysis, the FTD group had fewer stimulus bound responses, conceptual deficits, and spatial or planning errors compared to the AD group. In conclusion, both global and error analysis of the CDT helped discriminate the FTD group from controls and AD patients.

摘要

钟表绘制测试(CDT)是一种广泛使用的认知筛查测试。它有助于识别痴呆症群体中的局灶性病变和认知缺陷。最近,有几项研究尝试用它来区分痴呆症亚型。尽管许多研究已在痴呆症人群中对CDT进行了检验,但关于在额颞叶痴呆(FTD)中使用钟表绘制的研究却很有限。我们研究了FTD患者(n = 36)、阿尔茨海默病(AD;n = 25)患者和无痴呆症的对照组(n = 25)在CDT上的定量(整体)和定性(特定错误类型)差异。结果显示,与对照组相比,痴呆症组的总体得分显著更低,而FTD患者的得分显著高于AD组。在定性分析中,与AD组相比,FTD组的受刺激约束反应、概念缺陷以及空间或规划错误更少。总之,CDT的整体分析和错误分析均有助于将FTD组与对照组及AD患者区分开来。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验