Darst Catherine R, Cummings Molly E, Cannatella David C
Section of Integrative Biology and Texas Memorial Museum, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 11;103(15):5852-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0600625103. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
Many animals advertise their chemical defense to predators with conspicuous coloration and unpalatability, but little is known about the information in these signal elements. To effectively avoid predation, is it more advantageous to invest in increased conspicuousness or greater noxiousness, or to allocate equally to both signal modalities? Using natural variation among poison frog species measured with spectral reflectance and toxicity assays, we tested the relative importance of warning signal components with predator-learning and avoidance experiments. We demonstrate that closely related species use alternative strategies: increasing either conspicuousness or toxicity affords equivalent avoidance by predators and provides protection to nontoxic mimic species. These equally effective predator avoidance tactics demonstrate different aposematic solutions for two potentially costly signal components, providing a mechanism for natural diversity in warning signals.
许多动物通过醒目的颜色和难吃性向捕食者宣传它们的化学防御,但对于这些信号元素中的信息却知之甚少。为了有效地避免被捕食,增加醒目性或提高毒性,或者在两种信号模式上平均分配资源,哪种策略更具优势呢?我们利用光谱反射率测量和毒性测定所得到的毒蛙物种间的自然差异,通过捕食者学习和回避实验,测试了警告信号成分的相对重要性。我们证明,亲缘关系相近的物种采用了不同的策略:增加醒目性或毒性都能使捕食者产生同等程度的回避,并为无毒的拟态物种提供保护。这些同样有效的捕食者回避策略展示了针对两种可能代价高昂的信号成分的不同警戒解决方案,为警告信号的自然多样性提供了一种机制。