Cyr Ronald M
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0276, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;194(4):932-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.199.
Attempts to define, or enforce, an "ideal" cesarean section rate are futile, and should be abandoned. The cesarean rate is a consequence of individual value-laden clinical decisions, and is not amenable to the methods of evidence-based medicine. The influence of academic authority figures on the cesarean rate in the US is placed in historic context. Like other population health indices, the cesarean section rate is an indirect result of American public policy during the last century. Without major changes in the way health and maternity care are delivered in the US, the rate will continue to increase without improving population outcomes.
试图定义或强制实施“理想的”剖宫产率是徒劳的,应该摒弃这种做法。剖宫产率是由充满个人价值观的临床决策导致的,并不适用于循证医学的方法。美国学术权威人士对剖宫产率的影响被置于历史背景中进行考量。与其他人群健康指标一样,剖宫产率是美国上世纪公共政策的间接结果。如果美国的医疗保健和孕产妇保健提供方式不发生重大改变,剖宫产率将继续上升,而不会改善人群健康结果。