Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉下多伦多无支架瓣膜与瓣环上Perimount有支架置换主动脉瓣:160例患者随机对照的早期临床和血流动力学结果

The subcoronary Toronto stentless versus supra-annular Perimount stented replacement aortic valve: early clinical and hemodynamic results of a randomized comparison in 160 patients.

作者信息

Chambers John B, Rimington Helen M, Hodson Fiona, Rajani Ronak, Blauth Christopher I

机构信息

Valve Study Group, St Thomas Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Apr;131(4):878-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.11.021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A stentless valve is expected to be hemodynamically superior to a stented valve. The aim of this study was to compare early postoperative hemodynamic function and clinical events in a randomized, prospective series of 160 stentless and stented biological replacement aortic valves.

METHODS

We randomized 160 consecutive patients on 1 surgeon's list to receive either a Toronto stentless porcine valve (St Jude Medical, Inc, St Paul, Minn) or a Perimount stented bovine pericardial valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, Calif). Echocardiography was performed at discharge, between 3 and 6 months, and at 1 year after surgery. Statistical analysis was performed by both intention to treat and actual valves implanted.

RESULTS

The mean labeled size of both designs of valve was 24.7. There were no statistically significant differences in results at any time interval or whether analysis was performed by actual valves implanted or intention to treat. At 3 to 6 months for the Toronto versus the Perimount valve, the effective orifice area was 1.58 versus 1.66 cm2, the mean pressure difference was 7.54 versus 7.42 mm Hg, and the peak velocity was 2.07 versus 2.0.1 m/s. There was no difference in mortality, regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, or complications other than paraprosthetic regurgitation at 12 months or on follow-up for a proportion of the sample to 8 years. The incidence of regurgitation through the valves was similar for Toronto (10%) and Perimount (13.8%) at 1 year, but mild paraprosthetic regurgitation was found in 5 patients with the Perimount valve and none with Toronto valves.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in hemodynamic function or clinical events between the stented and stentless biological valves chosen for comparison in the early postoperative period or in preliminary follow-up to 5 years.

摘要

背景

无支架瓣膜在血流动力学方面预计优于有支架瓣膜。本研究的目的是比较160例接受无支架和有支架生物置换主动脉瓣膜的随机、前瞻性系列患者术后早期的血流动力学功能和临床事件。

方法

我们将同一位外科医生手术名单上的160例连续患者随机分为两组,分别接受多伦多无支架猪瓣膜(圣犹达医疗公司,明尼苏达州圣保罗)或Perimount有支架牛心包瓣膜(爱德华兹生命科学公司,加利福尼亚州欧文)。在出院时、术后3至6个月以及术后1年进行超声心动图检查。采用意向性分析和实际植入瓣膜分析两种方法进行统计分析。

结果

两种设计瓣膜的平均标称尺寸均为24.7。在任何时间间隔,以及无论是按实际植入瓣膜还是意向性分析,结果均无统计学显著差异。在术后3至6个月,多伦多瓣膜与Perimount瓣膜相比,有效瓣口面积分别为1.58平方厘米和1.66平方厘米,平均压差分别为7.54毫米汞柱和7.42毫米汞柱,峰值流速分别为2.07米/秒和2.01米/秒。在12个月时或对部分样本随访至8年时,死亡率、左心室肥厚消退情况或除人工瓣膜旁反流外的并发症均无差异。多伦多瓣膜(10%)和Perimount瓣膜(13.8%)在1年时瓣膜反流发生率相似,但Perimount瓣膜有5例患者出现轻度人工瓣膜旁反流,而多伦多瓣膜无此情况。

结论

在术后早期以及至5年的初步随访中,所比较的有支架和无支架生物瓣膜在血流动力学功能或临床事件方面无显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验