Schatzberg Alan, Roose Steven
Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94605-5548, USA.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Apr;14(4):361-70. doi: 10.1097/01.JGP.0000194645.70869.3b.
Despite the high prevalence of depression in elderly patients, few well-designed, placebo-controlled studies of antidepressants have been conducted in this population. This masked, placebo-controlled trial assessed the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine and fluoxetine in depressed patients older than 65 years.
Three hundred patients were randomly assigned to treatment with venlafaxine immediate release ([IR]; N = 104), fluoxetine (N = 100), or placebo (N = 96) in an eight-week trial. Venlafaxine doses were titrated from 37.5 to 225 mg per day and fluoxetine doses were titrated from 20 to 60 mg per day, as necessary, over 29 days. Efficacy variables included the 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D21) total score, HAM-D21 depressed mood item score, scores on the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I) scales, and rates of response (based on change from baseline HAM-D or MADRS score or CGI-I score) and remission (HAM-D17 < or =7). For the purposes of this report, efficacy analyses are focused on the HAM-D21 total score. Safety assessments included monitoring of adverse events (AEs), physical examinations, vital signs assessments, laboratory determinations, and electrocardiograms.
In all three of the treatment groups, there was a significant reduction at week 8 compared with the baseline HAM-D21 total score. However, there were no significant differences among the three treatment groups on the change in HAM-D21, MADRS, or CGI scores from baseline to week 8. There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of remitters at the last on-therapy visit. The incidence of individual AEs was higher in the venlafaxine group (27%) compared with patients taking fluoxetine (19%) or placebo (9%).
In this study, there was no significant difference in efficacy among placebo, venlafaxine, and fluoxetine for the treatment of depression.
尽管老年患者中抑郁症的患病率很高,但针对该人群进行的精心设计的、安慰剂对照的抗抑郁药研究却很少。这项双盲、安慰剂对照试验评估了文拉法辛和氟西汀对65岁以上抑郁症患者的疗效和安全性。
在一项为期八周的试验中,300名患者被随机分配接受速释文拉法辛([IR];N = 104)、氟西汀(N = 100)或安慰剂(N = 96)治疗。文拉法辛剂量在29天内根据需要从每天37.5毫克滴定至225毫克,氟西汀剂量从每天20毫克滴定至60毫克。疗效变量包括21项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D21)总分、HAM-D21抑郁情绪项目得分、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)得分、临床总体印象-疾病严重程度(CGI-S)和改善情况(CGI-I)量表得分,以及缓解率(基于HAM-D或MADRS得分或CGI-I得分相对于基线的变化)和缓解情况(HAM-D17≤7)。为了本报告的目的,疗效分析集中在HAM-D21总分上。安全性评估包括监测不良事件(AE)、体格检查、生命体征评估、实验室检查和心电图检查。
与基线HAM-D21总分相比,所有三个治疗组在第8周时均有显著降低。然而,从基线到第8周,三个治疗组在HAM-D21、MADRS或CGI得分的变化上没有显著差异。在最后一次治疗访视时,缓解者的比例没有统计学上的显著差异。与服用氟西汀(19%)或安慰剂(9%)的患者相比,文拉法辛组个体AE的发生率更高(27%)。
在本研究中,安慰剂、文拉法辛和氟西汀在治疗抑郁症方面的疗效没有显著差异。