Williams Gail M, Najman Jake M, Clavarino Alexandra
School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Mar;84(3):198-203. doi: 10.2471/blt.05.028894. Epub 2006 Mar 22.
Comparisons of the changing patterns of inequalities in occupational mortality provide one way to monitor the achievement of equity goals. However, previous comparisons have not corrected for numerator/denominator bias, which is a consequence of the different ways in which occupational details are recorded on death certificates and on census forms. The objective of this study was to measure the impact of this bias on mortality rates and ratios over time.
Using data provided by the Australian Bureau of Statistics, we examined the evidence for bias over the period 1981 -2002, and used imputation methods to adjust for this bias. We compared unadjusted with imputed rates of mortality for manual/non-manual workers.
Unadjusted data indicate increasing inequality in the age-adjusted rates of mortality for manual/non-manual workers during 1981 -2002. Imputed data suggest that there have been modest fluctuations in the ratios of mortality for manual/non-manual workers during this time, but with evidence that inequalities have increased only in recent years and are now at historic highs.
We found that imputation for missing data leads to changes in estimates of inequalities related to social class in mortality for some years but not for others. Occupational class comparisons should be imputed or otherwise adjusted for missing data on census or death certificates.
比较职业死亡率不平等的变化模式是监测公平目标实现情况的一种方式。然而,以往的比较并未校正分子/分母偏差,这是死亡证明和人口普查表上职业细节记录方式不同所导致的结果。本研究的目的是衡量这种偏差随时间对死亡率和死亡比的影响。
利用澳大利亚统计局提供的数据,我们研究了1981年至2002年期间偏差的证据,并使用插补方法校正这种偏差。我们比较了体力劳动者/非体力劳动者未校正的死亡率与插补后的死亡率。
未校正的数据表明,1981年至2002年期间,体力劳动者/非体力劳动者年龄校正后的死亡率不平等在加剧。插补后的数据表明,在此期间,体力劳动者/非体力劳动者的死亡比有适度波动,但有证据表明不平等仅在近年来有所增加,且目前处于历史高位。
我们发现,对缺失数据进行插补会导致某些年份与社会阶层相关的死亡率不平等估计值发生变化,但并非所有年份都如此。对于人口普查或死亡证明上的缺失数据,职业阶层比较应进行插补或其他调整。