Potter Louise, McCarthy Christopher, Oldham Jacqueline
Centre for Rehabilitation Science, University of Manchester, Central Manchester and Manchester Children's University Hospital's NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Mar-Apr;29(3):203-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.01.005.
To examine the intrarater reliability of identifying a manipulable lesion in the lumbar and thoracic spine.
An experienced osteopath used dynamic and static examination to assess 12 asymptomatic subjects for signs of joint dysfunction in the thoracic and lumbar spine. The selected segment was marked with an UV invisible mark. A second examiner visualized these marks with an UV lamp and recorded them on acetates for analysis; this process was then repeated an hour later. The distance from the marks to a fixed point was measured and within-day intrarater reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
The ICC(1,1) for the thoracic spine was 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.90). In the lumbar spine the ICC(1,1) was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.87-0.99).
This study shows that the lumbar spine joint perceived to be the joint most likely to benefit from a high-velocity low-amplitude thrust can be identified with good within-day reliability in an asymptomatic sample using a defined examination protocol. However, the reliability in identifying a joint exhibiting signs of segmental dysfunction in the thoracic spine was poor.
检验在腰椎和胸椎中识别可手法治疗病变的检查者内部可靠性。
一名经验丰富的整骨疗法师采用动态和静态检查,对12名无症状受试者的胸椎和腰椎关节功能障碍体征进行评估。选定的节段用紫外线不可见标记进行标记。第二名检查者用紫外线灯观察这些标记,并记录在醋酸纤维纸上以供分析;然后在一小时后重复此过程。测量标记到固定点的距离,并使用组内相关系数(ICC)计算日内检查者内部可靠性。
胸椎的ICC(1,1)为0.70(95%置信区间[CI],0.27 - 0.90)。腰椎的ICC(1,1)为0.96(95%CI,0.87 - 0.99)。
本研究表明,使用既定检查方案,在无症状样本中,被认为最有可能从高速低幅推力中获益的腰椎关节,可在日内以良好的可靠性被识别。然而,识别胸椎中表现出节段功能障碍体征的关节的可靠性较差。