相似文献
1
Assessment of Consistency Between the Arm-Fossa Test and Gillet Test: A Pilot Study.
J Chiropr Med. 2015 Mar;14(1):24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2014.12.006. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
2
Does the Gillet test assess sacroiliac motion or asymmetric one-legged stance strategies?
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2018 Aug;62(2):85-97.
3
Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of palpation for sacroiliac joint dysfunction.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1987 Aug;10(4):164-71.
4
Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of the Gillet test.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Jan;22(1):4-9. doi: 10.1016/s0161-4754(99)70098-9.
5
Positive sacroiliac screening tests in asymptomatic adults.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 May 15;19(10):1138-43. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199405001-00007.
6
Intraexaminer and Interexaminer Reproducibility of the Downing Test for Sacroiliac Joint Evaluation of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Individuals.
J Chiropr Med. 2019 Sep;18(3):163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2018.11.007. Epub 2019 Jul 21.
7
Association between composites of selected motion palpation and pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint disorders.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017 Apr;21(2):240-245. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
8
Are chiropractic tests for the lumbo-pelvic spine reliable and valid? A systematic critical literature review.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 May;23(4):258-75. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2000.106097.
9
Degree of vertical integration between the undergraduate program and clinical internship with respect to lumbopelvic diagnostic and therapeutic procedures taught at the canadian memorial chiropractic college.
J Chiropr Educ. 2010 Spring;24(1):46-56. doi: 10.7899/1042-5055-24.1.46.
10
The sensitivity and specificity of seven lumbo-pelvic orthopedic tests and the arm-fossa test.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990 Mar-Apr;13(3):138-43.
本文引用的文献
1
The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jun;67(6):622-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.019. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
2
Review of methods used by chiropractors to determine the site for applying manipulation.
Chiropr Man Therap. 2013 Oct 21;21(1):36. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-21-36.
3
Maintenance and improvement of interobserver reliability of osteopathic palpatory tests over a 4-month period.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2010 Oct;110(10):579-86.
4
What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jul 16;10:67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-67.
5
Cross-sectional validity study of compressive leg checking in measuring artificially created leg length inequality.
J Chiropr Med. 2004 Summer;3(3):91-5. doi: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60092-5.
6
Differences in feedforward trunk muscle activity in subgroups of patients with mechanical low back pain.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Jul;90(7):1159-69. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.10.033. Epub 2009 Jun 5.
7
Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of single and composites of selected motion palpation and pain provocation tests for sacroiliac joint.
Man Ther. 2009 Apr;14(2):213-21. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.02.004. Epub 2008 Mar 25.
8
On the reliability and validity of manual muscle testing: a literature review.
Chiropr Osteopat. 2007 Mar 6;15:4. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-15-4.
9
The reliability of selected motion- and pain provocation tests for the sacroiliac joint.
Man Ther. 2007 Feb;12(1):72-9. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2005.09.004. Epub 2006 Jul 12.
10
Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement of the manual examination of the lumbar spine in chronic low-back pain.
Eur Spine J. 2007 Feb;16(2):277-82. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0134-8. Epub 2006 May 6.
Zotero 插件