Lyness Jeffrey M, Heo Moonseong, Datto Catherine J, Ten Have Thomas R, Katz Ira R, Drayer Rebecca, Reynolds Charles F, Alexopoulos George S, Bruce Martha L
Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 4;144(7):496-504. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-7-200604040-00008.
Although depressive conditions in later life are a major public health problem, the outcomes of minor and subsyndromal depression are largely unknown.
To compare outcomes among patients with minor and subsyndromal depression, major depression, and no depression, and to examine putative outcome predictors.
Cohort study.
Patients from primary care practices in greater New York City, and Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
622 patients who were at least 60 years of age and presented for treatment in primary care practices that provided usual care in a randomized, controlled trial of suicide prevention. Of the 441 (70.9%) patients who completed 1 year of follow-up, 122 had major depression, 205 had minor or subsyndromal depression, and 114 did not have depression at baseline.
One year after a baseline evaluation, data were collected by using the following tools: Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the depressive disorders section of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition), Charlson Comorbidity Index, Multilevel Assessment Instrument for measuring instrumental activities of daily living, Physical Component Summary of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36, and Duke Social Support Index.
Patients with minor or subsyndromal depression had intermediate depressive and functional outcomes. Mean adjusted 1-year Hamilton depression score was 10.9 (95% CI, 9.6 to 12.2) for those with initial major depression, 7.0 (CI, 5.9 to 8.1) for those with minor or subsyndromal depression, and 2.9 (CI, 1.6 to 4.2) for those without depression (P < 0.001 for each paired comparison). Compared with patients who were not depressed, those who had minor or subsyndromal depression had a 5.5-fold risk (CI, 3.1-fold to 10.0-fold) for major depression at 1 year after controlling for demographic characteristics (P < 0.001). Cerebrovascular risk factors were not associated with a diagnosis of depression at 1 year after controlling for overall medical burden. Initial medical burden, self-rated health, and subjective social support were significant independent predictors of depression outcome.
Participants received care at practices that had personnel who had been given enhanced education about depression treatment; 29.1% of participants withdrew from the study before completing 1 year of follow-up.
The intermediate outcomes of minor and subsyndromal depression demonstrate the clinical significance of these conditions and suggest that they are part of a spectrum of depressive illness. Greater medical burden, poor subjective health status, and poorer subjective social support confer a higher risk for poor outcome.
尽管晚年抑郁状况是一个主要的公共卫生问题,但轻度和亚综合征性抑郁的后果在很大程度上尚不清楚。
比较轻度和亚综合征性抑郁患者、重度抑郁患者及无抑郁患者的结局,并检查可能的结局预测因素。
队列研究。
来自纽约市、宾夕法尼亚州费城和匹兹堡初级保健机构的患者。
622名年龄至少60岁的患者,他们在一项自杀预防随机对照试验中,于提供常规护理的初级保健机构接受治疗。在441名(70.9%)完成1年随访的患者中,122名患有重度抑郁,205名患有轻度或亚综合征性抑郁,114名在基线时无抑郁。
在基线评估1年后,使用以下工具收集数据:汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表、《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)结构化临床访谈中的抑郁障碍部分、查尔森合并症指数、用于测量日常生活工具性活动的多水平评估工具、医学结局研究简表36的躯体健康总结以及杜克社会支持指数。
轻度或亚综合征性抑郁患者的抑郁和功能结局处于中等水平。初始重度抑郁患者的平均调整后1年汉密尔顿抑郁评分为10.9(95%可信区间,9.6至12.2),轻度或亚综合征性抑郁患者为7.0(可信区间,5.9至8.1),无抑郁患者为2.9(可信区间,1.6至4.2)(每对比较P<0.001)。与未抑郁患者相比,在控制人口统计学特征后,轻度或亚综合征性抑郁患者在1年后患重度抑郁的风险高5.5倍(可信区间,3.1倍至10.0倍)(P<0.001)。在控制总体医疗负担后,脑血管危险因素与1年后的抑郁诊断无关。初始医疗负担、自评健康状况和主观社会支持是抑郁结局的重要独立预测因素。
参与者在接受过抑郁症治疗强化教育的人员所在的机构接受护理;29.1%的参与者在完成1年随访前退出了研究。
轻度和亚综合征性抑郁的中等结局证明了这些状况的临床意义,并表明它们是抑郁性疾病谱的一部分。更大的医疗负担、较差的主观健康状况和较差的主观社会支持会导致不良结局的风险更高。