Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
作者信息
Stone A J
机构信息
American University, Washington College of Law, Washington, DC, USA.
出版信息
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law. 2000;8(2):471-515.
PMID:16594110
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law. 2000;8(2):471-515.
2
Burying the dead: the case against revival of pre-Roe and pre-Casey abortion statutes in a post-Casey world.
Rev Law Soc Change. 1991;19(2):355-89.
3
4
From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
PS (Wash DC). 1993 Mar;26(1):53-8.
5
Informed consent civil actions for post-abortion psychological trauma.
Notre Dame Law Rev. 1996;71(4):639-70.
6
What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions.
Annu Surv Am Law. 1999;1999(1):129-67.
7
Mazurek v. Armstrong: should states be allowed to restrict the performance of abortions to licensed physicians only?
Thurgood Marshall Law Rev. 1998 Fall;24(1):149-82.
8
Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries.
Cumberland Law Rev. 1989;20(1):71-163.
9
Prenatal screening, autonomy and reasons: the relationship between the law of abortion and wrongful birth.
Med Law Rev. 2003 Autumn;11(3):265-325. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/11.3.265.
10
Abortion rights after South Dakota.
Free Inq. 2006 Jun-Jul;26(4):34-8.
Zotero 插件