Reproductive self-determination in the Third Circuit: the statutory proscription of wrongful birth and wrongful life claims as an unconstitutional violation of Planned Parenthood v. Casey's undue burden standard.
作者信息
Intromasso Christine
机构信息
Rutgers University School of Law, Newark, NJ, SA.
出版信息
Womens Rights Law Report. 2003 Spring;24(2):101-20.
PMID:15568248
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
2
The development of the undue burden standard in Stenberg v. Carhart: will proposed RU-486 legislation survive?
Indiana Law Rev. 2002;35(3):1021-44.
3
Equality theory and reproductive freedom.
Tex J Women Law. 1994;3(1):99-122.
4
Constitutionalizing Roe, Casey and Carhart: a legislative due-process anti-discrimination principle that gives constitutional content to the "undue burden" standard of review applied to abortion control legislation.
South Calif Rev Law Womens Stud. 2001 Spring;10(2):211-92.
5
The Casey undue burden standard: problems predicted and encountered, and the split over the Salerno test.
Hastings Constit Law Q. 1996;23:825-76.
6
Banning partial-birth abortion: drafting a constitutionally acceptable statute.
Univ Dayton Law Rev. 1998 Fall;24(1):187-214.
7
8
Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law. 2000;8(2):471-515.
9
Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care.
Womens Rights Law Report. 2001 Summer-Fall;23(1):63-77.
Zotero 插件