Flisser Eric, Grifo James A, Krey Lewis C, Noyes Nicole
Program for In Vitro Fertilization, Reproductive Surgery and Infertility, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA.
Fertil Steril. 2006 Feb;85(2):353-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.015.
To assess the clinical value of transabdominal ultrasound (TAS)--assisted embryo transfer on outcomes of in vitro fertilization--embryo transfer (IVF-ET) in comparison to the "clinical touch" method of transcervical embryo transfer by one physician and to determine if transabdominal ultrasound should be applied to all cases of embryo transfer in this practice.
A retrospective comparison study.
A university-based IVF practice.
PATIENT(S): Two hundred forty-nine patients who underwent transcervical transfer of fresh embryos created using autologous oocytes performed by the same physician from July 1, 2003, to June 30, 2004.
INTERVENTION(S): On selected days, at time of embryo transfer, transabdominal ultrasound was performed to guide catheter placement depth approximately 1 cm from the uterine fundus.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The presence of at least one gestational sac on ultrasound was compared in the two study groups; additionally, the clinical pregnancy rate (presence of fetal cardiac activity observed on ultrasound), the ectopic pregnancy rate, the biochemical pregnancy rate, and the implantation rate (number of gestational sacs identified on ultrasound per number of embryos transferred) between groups was evaluated. Characteristics of the two cohorts were analyzed to verify similarities between the treatment and control groups, including age of recipient, prior IVF history, day of transfer (day 3 or day 5 after retrieval), difficulty of transfer, the use of a tenaculum, and the quality and number of embryos transferred.
RESULT(S): No statistical difference was seen in the presence or number of gestational sacs following embryo transfer with or without transabdominal ultrasound guidance.
CONCLUSION(S): No additional advantage is conferred when using transabdominal ultrasound to perform embryo transfer. In experienced hands, the "clinical touch" method of embryo transfer yields equivalent results to transabdominal ultrasound-guided embryo placement. However, in patients with a prior history of difficult uterine sounding or embryo transfer, transabdominal ultrasound guidance may still play a role.
评估经腹超声(TAS)辅助胚胎移植与由一名医生采用“临床触摸”方法经宫颈胚胎移植相比,对体外受精 - 胚胎移植(IVF - ET)结局的临床价值,并确定在本实践中经腹超声是否应应用于所有胚胎移植病例。
一项回顾性比较研究。
一家大学附属的体外受精机构。
249例患者,于2003年7月1日至2004年6月30日由同一名医生使用自体卵母细胞进行新鲜胚胎经宫颈移植。
在选定的日子,于胚胎移植时,进行经腹超声检查以引导导管放置至距子宫底约1 cm深处。
比较两个研究组超声检查时至少有一个妊娠囊的情况;此外,评估两组之间的临床妊娠率(超声观察到胎儿心脏活动)、异位妊娠率、生化妊娠率和着床率(超声检查确定的妊娠囊数除以移植的胚胎数)。分析两组患者的特征以验证治疗组和对照组之间的相似性包括受者年龄、既往体外受精史、移植日(取卵后第3天或第5天)、移植难度、是否使用子宫颈钳以及移植胚胎的质量和数量。
在有或没有经腹超声引导下进行胚胎移植后,妊娠囊的存在或数量没有统计学差异。
使用经腹超声进行胚胎移植没有额外优势。在经验丰富的医生手中,“临床触摸”胚胎移植方法与经腹超声引导胚胎放置产生的结果相当。然而,对于有子宫探测困难或胚胎移植既往史的患者,经腹超声引导可能仍起作用。