Suppr超能文献

细胞诊断在肝外胆管狭窄管理中的应用

Cytodiagnosis in the management of extrahepatic biliary stricture.

作者信息

Desa L A, Akosa A B, Lazzara S, Domizio P, Krausz T, Benjamin I S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London.

出版信息

Gut. 1991 Oct;32(10):1188-91. doi: 10.1136/gut.32.10.1188.

Abstract

A total of 117 patients presenting with extrahepatic biliary strictures between 1981 and 1989 had 206 cytological examinations of the bile duct or bile (153 non-operative, 53 intraoperative) to establish the presence of malignancy. A final diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma was made in 88 patients, with 29 patients having benign biliary strictures. The cytological techniques used were fine needle aspiration (n = 102) or brushing (n = 24) of the bile duct, or exfoliative cytology of bile (n = 80). Forty one patients with malignancy had two or more examinations with differing results between samples in 20 cases. The overall sensitivity was 72%. There was only one false positive result, giving a patient predictive value of positive cytology of 98%. Intraoperative cytology was more sensitive than non-operative examination (80% v 42%). Overall, the sensitivity of fine needle aspiration (67%) was greater than that of brush cytology (40%) or exfoliative cytology (30%). No complications were encountered. Cytodiagnosis of extrahepatic biliary strictures is a safe procedure which is not technically demanding, and as it has a high sensitivity and predictive value for positive cytology, cytological confirmation of malignancy should be sought in all clinically and radiologically suspicious cases.

摘要

1981年至1989年间,共有117例出现肝外胆管狭窄的患者接受了206次胆管或胆汁细胞学检查(153次非手术检查,53次术中检查),以确定是否存在恶性肿瘤。最终诊断为胆管癌的患者有88例,29例患者为良性胆管狭窄。所采用的细胞学技术包括胆管细针穿刺(n = 102)或刷检(n = 24),或胆汁脱落细胞学检查(n = 80)。41例恶性肿瘤患者进行了两次或更多次检查,其中20例样本之间结果不同。总体敏感性为72%。仅有1例假阳性结果,细胞学阳性的患者预测值为98%。术中细胞学检查比非手术检查更敏感(80%对42%)。总体而言,细针穿刺的敏感性(67%)高于刷检细胞学(40%)或脱落细胞学(30%)。未出现并发症。肝外胆管狭窄的细胞诊断是一种安全的检查方法,对技术要求不高,由于其对细胞学阳性具有高敏感性和预测值,因此对于所有临床和放射学上可疑的病例,均应寻求恶性肿瘤的细胞学确诊。

相似文献

4
Biliary Brush Cytology Revisited.胆道刷检细胞学再探讨。
Acta Cytol. 2016;60(2):167-72. doi: 10.1159/000446149. Epub 2016 May 25.
7
Investigation of Factors Affecting the Sensitivity of Bile Duct Brush Cytology.影响胆管刷检细胞学敏感性的因素研究
Intern Med. 2019 Feb 1;58(3):329-335. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1551-18. Epub 2018 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic Ablation in Cholangiocarcinoma.胆管癌的内镜下消融治疗
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 29;17(17):2843. doi: 10.3390/cancers17172843.
5
Endoscopic Perspective in Cholangiocarcinoma Diagnostic Process.胆管癌诊断过程中的内镜视角
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 Dec 20;2019:9704870. doi: 10.1155/2019/9704870. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

6
Percutaneous biopsy.经皮活检
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984 Jan;142(1):41-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.142.1.41.
9
Malignant masquerade at the hilum of the liver.肝脏门部的恶性伪装。
Br J Surg. 1985 Aug;72(8):659-61. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800720826.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验