Magnotta Vincent A, Friedman Lee
Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, 0453-D JCP, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
J Digit Imaging. 2006 Jun;19(2):140-7. doi: 10.1007/s10278-006-0264-x.
The ability to analyze and merge data across sites, vendors, and field strengths depends on one's ability to acquire images with the same image quality including image smoothness, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). SNR can be used to compare different magnetic resonance scanners as a measure of comparability between the systems. This study looks at the SNR and CNR ratios in structural fast spin-echo T2-weighted scans acquired in five individuals across ten sites that are part of Functional Imaging Research of Schizophrenia Testbed Biomedical Informatics Research Network (fBIRN). Different manufacturers, field strengths, gradient coils, and RF coils were used at these sites. The SNR of gray matter was fairly uniform (41.3-43.3) across scanners at 1.5 T. The higher field scanners produced images with significantly higher SNR values (44.5-108.7 at 3 T and 50.8 at 4 T). Similar results were obtained for CNR measurements between gray/white matter at 1.5 T (9.5-10.2), again increasing at higher fields (10.1-28.9 at 3 T and 10.9 at 4 T).
跨站点、供应商和场强分析和合并数据的能力取决于获取具有相同图像质量(包括图像平滑度、信噪比(SNR)和对比度噪声比(CNR))图像的能力。SNR可用于比较不同的磁共振扫描仪,作为系统之间可比性的一种度量。本研究观察了参与精神分裂症试验台生物医学信息学研究网络(fBIRN)的十个站点中五名个体所采集的结构快速自旋回波T2加权扫描中的SNR和CNR比率。这些站点使用了不同的制造商、场强、梯度线圈和射频线圈。在1.5T时,灰质的SNR在各扫描仪之间相当均匀(41.3 - 43.3)。更高场强的扫描仪产生的图像具有显著更高的SNR值(3T时为44.5 - 108.7,4T时为50.8)。在1.5T时,灰质/白质之间的CNR测量也得到了类似结果(9.5 - 10.2),在更高场强时再次增加(3T时为10.1 - 28.9,4T时为10.9)。