Suppr超能文献

对电诊断检查申请的进一步严格评估。

A further critical evaluation of requests for electrodiagnostic examinations.

作者信息

Cocito D, Tavella A, Ciaramitaro P, Costa P, Poglio F, Paolasso I, Duranda E, Cossa F M, Bergamasco B

机构信息

SOC Neurologia I DU, UO Neurofisiologia Clinica, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Università di Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Neurol Sci. 2006 Feb;26(6):419-22. doi: 10.1007/s10072-006-0525-y.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of electrophysiological (EDX) tests in the clinical management and diagnosis of patients, and the appropriateness of the referral diagnosis. A study was carried out in three electrodiagnostic services in the Torino area, over a 12-month period. In our study 3,900 individuals (2,340 females, 1,560 males) were evaluated. Patients underwent EDX examinations including nerve conduction study, electromyography and repetitive stimulation test. Most patients had been sent for EDX tests by specialists. Specialists suspected mainly polyneuropathy, whilst general practitioners suspected mainly carpal tunnel syndrome. Seventy-two percent of the requests were correctly formulated, 55% by general practitioners and 77% by specialists. There was a concordance between the results of the EDX tests and diagnostic hypothesis 40% of the time. This study confirms the usefulness and diagnostic impact of EDX examinations and evidences the amount of time and resources wasted as a result of incorrect or incomplete requests.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估电生理(EDX)检查对患者临床管理和诊断的影响,以及转诊诊断的合理性。在都灵地区的三个电诊断科室进行了为期12个月的研究。在我们的研究中,对3900人(2340名女性,1560名男性)进行了评估。患者接受了包括神经传导研究、肌电图和重复刺激试验在内的EDX检查。大多数患者是由专科医生送去做EDX检查的。专科医生主要怀疑是多发性神经病,而全科医生主要怀疑是腕管综合征。72%的检查申请表述正确,全科医生的正确率为55%,专科医生为77%。EDX检查结果与诊断假设在40%的时间内一致。本研究证实了EDX检查的有用性和诊断影响,并揭示了因申请不正确或不完整而浪费的时间和资源数量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验