Tewksbury Joshua J, Garner Lindy, Garner Shannon, Lloyd John D, Saab Victoria, Martin Thomas E
Department of Biology, University of Washington, 106 Kincaid Hall, Box 351800, Seattle, Washington 98195-1800, USA.
Ecology. 2006 Mar;87(3):759-68. doi: 10.1890/04-1790.
The effects of landscape fragmentation on nest predation and brood parasitism, the two primary causes of avian reproductive failure, have been difficult to generalize across landscapes, yet few studies have clearly considered the context and spatial scale of fragmentation. Working in two river systems fragmented by agricultural and rural-housing development, we tracked nesting success and brood parasitism in > 2500 bird nests in 38 patches of deciduous riparian woodland. Patches on both river systems were embedded in one of two local contexts (buffered from agriculture by coniferous forest, or adjacent to agriculture), but the abundance of agriculture and human habitation within 1 km of each patch was highly variable. We examined evidence for three models of landscape effects on nest predation based on (1) the relative importance of generalist agricultural nest predators, (2) predators associated with the natural habitats typically removed by agricultural development, or (3) an additive combination of these two predator communities. We found strong support for an additive predation model in which landscape features affect nest predation differently at different spatial scales. Riparian habitat with forest buffers had higher nest predation rates than sites adjacent to agriculture, but nest predation also increased with increasing agriculture in the larger landscape surrounding each site. These results suggest that predators living in remnant woodland buffers, as well as generalist nest predators associated with agriculture, affect nest predation rates, but they appear to respond at different spatial scales. Brood parasitism, in contrast, was unrelated to agricultural abundance on the landscape, but showed a strong nonlinear relationship with farm and house density, indicating a critical point at which increased human habitat causes increased brood parasitism. Accurate predictions regarding landscape effects on nest predation and brood parasitism will require an increased appreciation of the multiple scales at which landscape components influence predator and parasite behavior.
景观破碎化对巢捕食和巢寄生(鸟类繁殖失败的两个主要原因)的影响,在不同景观中难以一概而论,然而很少有研究明确考虑破碎化的背景和空间尺度。我们在两个因农业和农村住房开发而破碎化的河流系统中开展研究,追踪了38片落叶河岸林地中2500多个鸟巢的筑巢成功率和巢寄生情况。两个河流系统中的斑块都处于两种当地环境之一(被针叶林与农业隔开,或与农业相邻),但每个斑块1公里范围内农业和人类居住的密集程度差异很大。我们基于以下三种模型检验了景观对巢捕食影响的证据:(1)一般化的农业巢捕食者的相对重要性;(2)与通常因农业开发而消失的自然栖息地相关的捕食者;(3)这两个捕食者群落的加性组合。我们发现有力支持一种加性捕食模型,即景观特征在不同空间尺度上对巢捕食的影响不同。有森林缓冲区的河岸栖息地的巢捕食率高于与农业相邻的地点,但在每个地点周围更大的景观中,巢捕食也随着农业的增加而增加。这些结果表明,生活在残留林地缓冲区的捕食者以及与农业相关的一般化巢捕食者都会影响巢捕食率,但它们似乎在不同空间尺度上做出反应。相比之下,巢寄生与景观中的农业密集程度无关,但与农场和房屋密度呈现出强烈的非线性关系,表明存在一个临界点,即人类栖息地增加会导致巢寄生增加。要准确预测景观对巢捕食和巢寄生的影响,需要更深入地认识景观组成部分影响捕食者和寄生虫行为的多个尺度。