Suppr超能文献

使用降落伞预防与重力挑战相关的死亡和重大创伤:随机对照试验的系统评价

Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

作者信息

Smith Gordon C S, Pell Jill P

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cambridge University, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Mar-Apr;19(2):126-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether parachutes are effective in preventing major trauma related to gravitational challenge. Design Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases; appropriate internet sites and citation lists.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies showing the effects of using a parachute during free fall.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Death or major trauma, defined as an injury severity score > 15.

RESULTS

We were unable to identify any randomised controlled trials of parachute intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

As with many interventions intended to prevent ill health, the effectiveness of parachutes has not been subjected to rigorous evaluation by using randomised controlled trials. Advocates of evidence based medicine have criticised the adoption of interventions evaluated by using only observational data. We think that everyone might benefit if the most radical protagonists of evidence based medicine organised and participated in a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover trial of the parachute.

摘要

目的

确定降落伞在预防与重力挑战相关的重大创伤方面是否有效。设计随机对照试验的系统评价。

数据来源

Medline、科学网、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库;相关互联网网站及引文列表。

研究选择

显示自由落体过程中使用降落伞效果的研究。

主要结局指标

死亡或重大创伤,定义为损伤严重程度评分>15。

结果

我们未能识别出任何降落伞干预的随机对照试验。

结论

与许多旨在预防健康问题的干预措施一样,降落伞的有效性尚未通过随机对照试验进行严格评估。循证医学的倡导者批评仅使用观察性数据评估的干预措施的采用。我们认为,如果循证医学最激进的支持者组织并参与一项降落伞的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、交叉试验,每个人可能都会受益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验