Smith Gordon C S, Pell Jill P
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cambridge University, United Kingdom.
Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Mar-Apr;19(2):126-8.
To determine whether parachutes are effective in preventing major trauma related to gravitational challenge. Design Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases; appropriate internet sites and citation lists.
Studies showing the effects of using a parachute during free fall.
Death or major trauma, defined as an injury severity score > 15.
We were unable to identify any randomised controlled trials of parachute intervention.
As with many interventions intended to prevent ill health, the effectiveness of parachutes has not been subjected to rigorous evaluation by using randomised controlled trials. Advocates of evidence based medicine have criticised the adoption of interventions evaluated by using only observational data. We think that everyone might benefit if the most radical protagonists of evidence based medicine organised and participated in a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover trial of the parachute.
确定降落伞在预防与重力挑战相关的重大创伤方面是否有效。设计随机对照试验的系统评价。
Medline、科学网、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库;相关互联网网站及引文列表。
显示自由落体过程中使用降落伞效果的研究。
死亡或重大创伤,定义为损伤严重程度评分>15。
我们未能识别出任何降落伞干预的随机对照试验。
与许多旨在预防健康问题的干预措施一样,降落伞的有效性尚未通过随机对照试验进行严格评估。循证医学的倡导者批评仅使用观察性数据评估的干预措施的采用。我们认为,如果循证医学最激进的支持者组织并参与一项降落伞的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、交叉试验,每个人可能都会受益。