Koeman Mirelle, van der Ven Andre J A M, Hak Eelko, Joore Hans C A, Kaasjager Karin, de Smet Annemarie G A, Ramsay Graham, Dormans Tom P J, Aarts Leon P H J, de Bel Ernst E, Hustinx Willem N M, van der Tweel Ingeborg, Hoepelman Andy M, Bonten Marc J M
University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, and Department of Internal Medicine and Intensive Care Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Jun 15;173(12):1348-55. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200505-820OC. Epub 2006 Apr 7.
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most frequently occurring nosocomial infection associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Although oral decontamination with antibiotics reduces incidences of VAP, it is not recommended because of potential selection of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. We hypothesized that oral decontamination with either chlorhexidine (CHX, 2%) or CHX/colistin (CHX/COL, 2%/2%) would reduce and postpone development of VAP, and oral and endotracheal colonization.
To determine the effect of oral decontamination with CHX or CHX/COL on VAP incidence and time to development of VAP.
Consecutive patients needing mechanical ventilation for 48 h or more were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with three arms: CHX, CHX/COL, and placebo (PLAC). Trial medication was applied every 6 h into the buccal cavity. Oropharyngeal swabs were obtained daily and quantitatively analyzed for gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms. Endotracheal colonization was monitored twice weekly.
Of 385 patients included, 130 received PLAC, 127 CHX and 128 CHX/COL. Baseline characteristics were comparable. The daily risk of VAP was reduced in both treatment groups compared with PLAC: 65% (hazard ratio [HR]=0.352; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.160, 0. 791; p=0.012) for CHX and 55% (HR=0.454; 95% CI, 0.224, 0. 925; p=0.030) for CHX/COL. CHX/COL provided significant reduction in oropharyngeal colonization with both gram-negative and gram-positive microorganisms, whereas CHX mostly affected gram-positive microorganisms. Endotracheal colonization was reduced for CHX/COL patients and to a lesser extent for CHX patients. No differences in duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, or intensive care unit survival could be demonstrated.
Topical oral decontamination with CHX or CHX/COL reduces the incidence of VAP.
呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)是最常见的医院获得性感染,与发病率和死亡率增加相关。尽管使用抗生素进行口腔去污可降低VAP的发生率,但由于可能会选择出对抗生素耐药的病原体,因此不推荐使用。我们假设用洗必泰(CHX,2%)或洗必泰/黏菌素(CHX/COL,2%/2%)进行口腔去污可减少并推迟VAP的发生以及口腔和气管内定植。
确定用CHX或CHX/COL进行口腔去污对VAP发生率和VAP发生时间的影响。
将需要机械通气48小时或更长时间的连续患者纳入一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,该试验分为三组:CHX组、CHX/COL组和安慰剂(PLAC)组。试验药物每6小时应用于颊腔一次。每天获取口咽拭子,并对革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性微生物进行定量分析。每周监测两次气管内定植情况。
在纳入的385例患者中,130例接受PLAC,127例接受CHX,128例接受CHX/COL。基线特征具有可比性。与PLAC组相比,两个治疗组的VAP每日风险均降低:CHX组降低65%(风险比[HR]=0.352;95%置信区间[CI],0.160,0.791;p=0.012),CHX/COL组降低55%(HR=0.454;95%CI,0.224,0.925;p=0.030)。CHX/COL可显著减少革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性微生物的口咽定植,而CHX主要影响革兰氏阳性微生物。CHX/COL组患者的气管内定植减少,CHX组患者的气管内定植减少程度较小。在机械通气时间、重症监护病房住院时间或重症监护病房生存率方面未发现差异。
用CHX或CHX/COL进行局部口腔去污可降低VAP的发生率。