Hean Sarah, Clark Jill Macleod, Adams Kim, Humphris Debra
Institute of Health and Community Studies, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK.
J Interprof Care. 2006 Mar;20(2):162-81. doi: 10.1080/13561820600646546.
The extent to which health and social care (HSC) students hold stereotypical views of other HSC professional groups is of great potential importance to team working in health care. This paper explores students' perceptions of different HSC professional groups at the beginning of their university programmes. Findings are presented from an analysis of baseline data collected as part of the New Generation Project longitudinal cohort study which is assessing the impact of interprofessional education over time on a range of variables including stereotyping. Questionnaires were administered to a cohort of over 1200 students from 10 different HSC professional groups entering their first year of university. Stereotypes were measured using a tool adapted from Barnes et al. (2000) designed to elicit stereotype ratings on a range of nine characteristics. The findings confirm that students arrive at university with an established and consistent set of stereotypes about other health and social care professional groups. Stereotypical profiles were compiled for each professional group indicating the distinctive characteristics of the groups as well as the similarities and differences between groups.Midwives, social workers and nurses were rated most highly on interpersonal skills and on being a team player whilst doctors were rated most highly on academic ability. Doctors, midwives and social workers were perceived as having the strongest leadership role, whilst doctors were also rated most highly on decision making. All professions were rated highly on confidence and professional competence and, with the exception of social workers, on practical skills. A comparison of profiles for each professional group reveals that, for example, pharmacists and doctors were perceived as having very similar characteristics as were social workers, midwives and nurses. However, the profiles of nurses and doctors were perceived to be very different. The implications of these similarities and differences are discussed in terms of their potential impact on interprofessional interactions, role boundaries and team working.
健康与社会照护(HSC)专业的学生对其他HSC专业群体持有刻板印象的程度,对于医疗保健领域的团队协作具有极大的潜在重要性。本文探讨了学生在大学课程开始时对不同HSC专业群体的认知。研究结果来自对作为“新一代项目”纵向队列研究一部分所收集的基线数据的分析,该研究正在评估跨专业教育随着时间推移对包括刻板印象在内的一系列变量的影响。对来自10个不同HSC专业群体、进入大学一年级的1200多名学生进行了问卷调查。使用了一种改编自巴恩斯等人(2000年)的工具来测量刻板印象,该工具旨在就一系列九个特征得出刻板印象评分。研究结果证实,学生进入大学时就对其他健康与社会照护专业群体持有一套既定且一致的刻板印象。为每个专业群体编制了刻板印象概况,表明了各群体的独特特征以及群体之间的异同。助产士、社会工作者和护士在人际交往能力和团队合作方面的评分最高,而医生在学术能力方面的评分最高。医生、助产士和社会工作者被认为具有最强领导作用,同时医生在决策能力方面的评分也最高。所有专业在自信和专业能力方面的评分都很高,除社会工作者外,在实践技能方面的评分也很高。对每个专业群体概况的比较表明,例如,药剂师和医生被认为具有非常相似的特征,社会工作者、助产士和护士也是如此。然而,护士和医生的概况被认为非常不同。根据这些异同对跨专业互动、角色界限和团队协作的潜在影响进行了讨论。