Tracy Bliss L, Krewski Daniel, Chen Jing, Zielinski Jan M, Brand Kevin P, Meyerhof Dorothy
Radiation Protection Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2006 Apr;69(7):735-58. doi: 10.1080/15287390500261281.
Epidemiologic studies of uranium miners and other underground miners have consistently shown miners exposed to high levels of radon to be at increased risk of lung cancer. More recently, concern has arisen about lung cancer risks among people exposed to lower levels of radon in homes. The current Canadian guideline for residential radon exposure was set in 1988 at 800 Bq/m(3). Because of the accumulation of a considerable body of new scientific evidence on radon lung cancer risks since that time, Health Canada sponsored a workshop to review the current state-of-the-science on radon health risks. The specific objectives of the workshop were (1) to collect and assess scientific information relevant to setting national radon policy in Canada, and (2) to gather information on social, political, and operational considerations in setting national policy. The workshop, held on 3-4 March 2004, was attended by 38 invited scientists, regulators, and other stakeholders from Canada and the United States. The presentations on the first day dealt primarily with scientific issues. The combined analysis of North American residential radon and lung cancer studies was reviewed. The analysis confirmed a small but detectable increase in lung cancer risk at residential exposure levels. Current estimates suggest that radon in homes is responsible for approximately 10% of all lung cancer deaths in Canada, making radon the second leading cause of lung cancer after tobacco smoking. This was followed by a perspective from an UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation) working group on radon. There were two presentations on occupational exposures to radon and two presentations considered the possibility of radon as a causative factor for cardiovascular disease and for cancer in other organs besides the lung. The possible contribution of environmental tobacco smoke to lung cancers in nonsmokers was also considered. Areas for future research were identified. The second day was devoted to policy and operational issues. The presentations began with a perspective from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, followed by a history of radon policy development in Canada. Subsequent presentations dealt with the cost-effectiveness of radon mitigation, Canadian building codes and radon, and a summary of radon standards from around the world. Provincial representatives and a private consultant were given opportunities to present their viewpoints. A number of strategies for reducing residential radon exposure in Canada were recognized, including testing and mitigation of existing homes (on either a widespread or targeted basis) and changing the building code to require that radon mitigation devices be installed at the time a new home is constructed. The various elements of a comprehensive national radon policy were set forth.
对铀矿工人和其他地下矿工的流行病学研究一直表明,接触高浓度氡的矿工患肺癌的风险会增加。最近,人们开始关注在家中接触较低浓度氡的人群的肺癌风险。加拿大目前的住宅氡暴露指南于1988年制定,为每立方米800贝克勒尔。自那时以来,由于积累了大量关于氡致肺癌风险的新科学证据,加拿大卫生部主办了一次研讨会,以审查氡健康风险方面的当前科学状况。该研讨会的具体目标是:(1)收集和评估与制定加拿大国家氡政策相关的科学信息;(2)收集有关制定国家政策时的社会、政治和操作方面考虑因素的信息。2004年3月3日至4日举行的这次研讨会,有来自加拿大和美国的38位受邀科学家、监管人员及其他利益相关者参加。第一天的报告主要涉及科学问题。对北美住宅氡与肺癌研究的综合分析进行了审查。该分析证实,在住宅暴露水平下肺癌风险有小幅但可检测到的增加。目前的估计表明,加拿大约10%的肺癌死亡是由家中的氡造成的,这使得氡成为仅次于吸烟的第二大致肺癌原因。接下来是联合国原子辐射影响科学委员会(UNSCEAR)一个关于氡的工作组的观点。有两场关于职业性氡暴露的报告,还有两场报告探讨了氡作为心血管疾病以及肺部以外其他器官癌症致病因素的可能性。还考虑了环境烟草烟雾对不吸烟者肺癌的可能影响。确定了未来的研究领域。第二天专门讨论政策和操作问题。报告开始是美国环境保护局的观点,接着是加拿大氡政策发展的历史。随后的报告涉及氡减排的成本效益、加拿大建筑规范与氡,以及世界各地氡标准的总结。省级代表和一位私人顾问有机会发表他们的观点。人们认识到一些在加拿大降低住宅氡暴露的策略,包括对现有房屋进行检测和减排(广泛或有针对性地进行),以及修改建筑规范,要求在新建房屋时安装氡减排装置。阐述了全面国家氡政策的各个要素。