Field R William, Krewski Daniel, Lubin Jay H, Zielinski Jan M, Alavanja Michael, Catalan Vanessa S, Klotz Judith B, Létourneau Ernest G, Lynch Charles F, Lyon Joseph L, Sandler Dale P, Schoenberg Janet B, Steck Daniel J, Stolwijk Jan A, Weinberg Clarice, Wilcox Homer B
Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2006 Apr;69(7):599-631. doi: 10.1080/15287390500260960.
Lung cancer has held the distinction as the most common cancer type worldwide since 1985 (Parkin et al., 1993). Recent estimates suggest that lung cancer accounted for 1.2 million deaths worldwide in 2002, which represents 17.6% of the global cancer deaths (Parkin et al., 2005). During 2002, the highest lung cancer rates for men worldwide reportedly occurred in North America and Eastern Europe, whereas the highest rates in females occurred in North America and Northern Europe (Parkin et al., 2005). While tobacco smoking is the leading risk factor for lung cancer, because of the magnitude of lung cancer mortality, even secondary causes of lung cancer present a major public health concern (Field, 2001). Extrapolations from epidemiologic studies of radon-exposed miners project that approximately 18,600 lung cancer deaths per year (range 3000 to 41,000) in the United States alone are attributable to residential radon progeny exposure (National Research Council, 1999). Because of differences between the mines and the home environment, as well as differences (such as breathing rates) between miners and the general public, there was a need to directly evaluate effects of radon in homes. Seven major residential case-control radon studies have been conducted in North America to directly examine the association between prolonged radon progeny (radon) exposure and lung cancer. Six of the studies were performed in the United States including studies in New Jersey, Missouri (two studies), Iowa, and the combined states study (Connecticut, Utah, and southern Idaho). The seventh study was performed in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. The residential case-control studies performed in the United States were previously reviewed elsewhere (Field, 2001). The goal of this review is to provide additional details regarding the methodologies and findings for the individual studies. Radon concentration units presented in this review adhere to the types (pCi/L or Bq/m3) presented in the individual studies. One picocurie per liter is equivalent to 37 Bq/m3. Because the Iowa study calculated actual measures of exposure (concentration x time), its exposures estimates are presented in the form WLM(5-19) (Field et al., 2000a). WLM(5-19) represents the working level months for exposures that occurred 5-19 yr prior to diagnosis for cases or time of interview for control. Eleven WLM(5-19) is approximately equivalent to an average residential radon exposure of 4 pCi/L for 15 yr, assuming a 70% home occupancy.
自1985年以来,肺癌一直是全球最常见的癌症类型(帕金等人,1993年)。最近的估计表明,2002年全球肺癌死亡人数达120万,占全球癌症死亡人数的17.6%(帕金等人,2005年)。据报道,2002年全球男性肺癌发病率最高的地区是北美和东欧,而女性发病率最高的地区是北美和北欧(帕金等人,2005年)。虽然吸烟是肺癌的主要危险因素,但由于肺癌死亡率很高,即使是肺癌的次要病因也引起了重大的公共卫生关注(菲尔德,2001年)。对接触氡的矿工进行的流行病学研究推断,仅在美国,每年约有18,600例肺癌死亡(范围为3000至41,000例)可归因于家庭氡子体暴露(美国国家研究委员会,1999年)。由于矿井与家庭环境之间存在差异,以及矿工与普通公众之间存在差异(如呼吸频率),因此有必要直接评估家庭中氡的影响。在北美已经进行了七项主要的家庭氡病例对照研究,以直接检验长期暴露于氡子体(氡)与肺癌之间的关联。其中六项研究在美国进行,包括在新泽西州、密苏里州(两项研究)、爱荷华州以及联合州研究(康涅狄格州、犹他州和爱达荷州南部)。第七项研究在加拿大马尼托巴省温尼伯市进行。美国进行的家庭病例对照研究此前已在其他地方进行过综述(菲尔德,2001年)。本综述的目的是提供有关各项研究的方法和结果的更多详细信息。本综述中给出的氡浓度单位遵循各项研究中给出的类型(皮居里/升或贝克勒尔/立方米)。每升1皮居里相当于37贝克勒尔/立方米。由于爱荷华州的研究计算了实际暴露量(浓度×时间),其暴露估计值以WLM(5 - 19)的形式给出(菲尔德等人,2000a)。WLM(5 - 19)代表病例诊断前或对照访谈时间前5 - 19年发生的暴露的工作水平月数。假设家庭居住率为70%,11个WLM(5 - 19)大约相当于15年平均家庭氡暴露量为4皮居里/升。