Dallari D, Fini M, Stagni C, Torricelli P, Nicoli Aldini N, Giavaresi G, Cenni E, Baldini N, Cenacchi A, Bassi A, Giardino R, Fornasari P M, Giunti A
VII Orthopaedic and Traumatology Division, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Via Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
J Orthop Res. 2006 May;24(5):877-88. doi: 10.1002/jor.20112.
The repair of confined trabecular bone defects in rabbits treated by autologous bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), freeze-dried bone allografts (FDBA) alone and in combination (BMSC + PRP; FDBA + BMSC; FDBA + PRP; FDBA + PRP + BMSC) was compared. A critical size defect was created in the distal part of the femurs of 48 adult rabbits. Histology and histomorphometry were used in the evaluation of healing at 2, 4, and 12 weeks after surgery. The healing rate (%) was calculated by measuring the residual bone defect area. Architecture of the newly formed bone was compared with that of bone at the same distal femur area of healthy rabbits. The defect healing rate was higher in PRP + BMSC, FDBA + PRP, FDBA + BMSC, and FDBA + PRP + BMSC treatments, while lower values were achieved with PRP treatment at all experimental times. The highest bone-healing rate at 2 weeks was achieved with FDBA + PRP + BMSC treatment, which resulted significantly different from PRP (p < 0.05) and BMSC (p < 0.05) treatments. At 4 weeks, the bone-healing rate increased except for PRP treatment. Finally, the bone-healing rate of FDBA + PRP, FDBA + BMSC, and FDBA + PRP + BMSC was significantly higher than that of PRP at 12 weeks (p < 0.05). At 12 weeks, significant differences still existed between PRP, BMSC, and FDBA groups and normal bone (p < 0.05). These results showed that the combination of FDBA, BMSC and PRP permitted an acceleration in bone healing and bone remodeling processes.
比较了单独使用自体骨髓基质细胞(BMSC)、富血小板血浆(PRP)、冻干同种异体骨(FDBA)以及联合使用(BMSC + PRP;FDBA + BMSC;FDBA + PRP;FDBA + PRP + BMSC)治疗兔局限性小梁骨缺损的修复情况。在48只成年兔的股骨远端制造了临界尺寸的缺损。在术后2、4和12周,采用组织学和组织形态计量学评估愈合情况。通过测量残余骨缺损面积计算愈合率(%)。将新形成骨的结构与健康兔同一股骨远端区域的骨结构进行比较。PRP + BMSC、FDBA + PRP、FDBA + BMSC和FDBA + PRP + BMSC治疗组的缺损愈合率较高,而在所有实验时间点,PRP治疗组的愈合率较低。FDBA + PRP + BMSC治疗在2周时实现了最高的骨愈合率,与PRP(p < 0.05)和BMSC(p < 0.05)治疗组相比有显著差异。在4周时,除PRP治疗外,骨愈合率均有所增加。最后,在12周时,FDBA + PRP、FDBA + BMSC和FDBA + PRP + BMSC的骨愈合率显著高于PRP(p < 0.05)。在12周时,PRP、BMSC和FDBA组与正常骨之间仍存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。这些结果表明,FDBA、BMSC和PRP联合使用可加速骨愈合和骨重塑过程。