Petersen Alan, Anderson Alison, Allan Stuart
School of Sociology, Politics and Law, University of Plymouth, 8 Portland Villas, Drake Circus, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA, UK.
New Genet Soc. 2005 Dec;24(3):337-53. doi: 10.1080/14636770500350088.
News media coverage of biotechnology issues offers a rich source of fictional portrayals, with stories drawing strongly on popular imagery and metaphors in descriptions of the powers and dangers of biotechnology. This article examines how science fiction metaphors, imagery and motifs surface in British newspaper (broadsheet and tabloid) coverage of medical genetic issues, focusing on press reporting of two recent highly publicised news media events; namely, the Hashmi and Whitaker families' plights to use stem cells from a 'perfectly matched sibling' for the treatment of their diseased children. It is concerned in particular with the extent to which journalists' use of certain literary devices encourages preferred formulations of medical genetics, and thereby potentially shapes public deliberation about scientific developments and their consequences for society. Understanding how science fiction sustains science fact, and vice versa, and how the former is portrayed in news media, it is argued, would thus seem to be crucial in the effort to understand why people respond so strongly to biotechnologies, and what they imagine their consequences to be.
新闻媒体对生物技术问题的报道提供了丰富的虚构描绘来源,这些报道在描述生物技术的力量和危险时大量借鉴了流行的意象和隐喻。本文探讨科幻小说的隐喻、意象和主题是如何在英国报纸(大报和小报)对医学遗传学问题的报道中浮现的,重点关注最近两个备受关注的新闻媒体事件的新闻报道;即哈希米家族和惠特克家族为了给患病孩子治疗而使用来自“完美匹配的兄弟姐妹”的干细胞的困境。本文特别关注记者对某些文学手法的运用在多大程度上促成了医学遗传学的偏好表述,从而可能影响公众对科学发展及其对社会影响的讨论。有人认为,理解科幻小说如何支撑科学事实,反之亦然,以及前者在新闻媒体中的呈现方式,对于理解人们为何对生物技术反应如此强烈以及他们认为其后果会是什么至关重要。