Nagy Peter, Wylie Ruth, Eschrich Joey, Finn Ed
Center for Science and the Imagination, Arizona State University, PO Box 876511, Tempe, AZ, 85287-6511, USA.
Center for Science and the Imagination, Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Jun;15(2):279-292. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9846-9. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
Reflecting the dangers of irresponsible science and technology, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein quickly became a mythic story that still feels fresh and relevant in the twenty-first century. The unique framework of the Frankenstein myth has permeated the public discourse about science and knowledge, creating various misconceptions around and negative expectations for scientists and for scientific enterprises more generally. Using the Frankenstein myth as an imaginative tool, we interviewed twelve scientists to explore how this science narrative shapes their views and perceptions of science. Our results yielded two main conclusions. First, the Frankenstein myth may help scientists identify popular concerns about their work and offer a framework for constructing a more positive narrative. Second, finding optimistic science narratives may allow scientists to build a better relationship with the public. We argue that by showing the ethical principles and social dimensions of their work, scientists could replace a negative Frankenstein narrative with a more optimistic one.
玛丽·雪莱的《科学怪人》反映了不负责任的科学技术带来的危险,它很快就成为了一个神话故事,在21世纪仍然让人感觉新颖且具有现实意义。《科学怪人》神话的独特框架已经渗透到关于科学和知识的公众话语中,围绕科学家以及更广泛的科学事业产生了各种误解和负面期望。我们以《科学怪人》神话为一种富有想象力的工具,采访了12位科学家,以探讨这种科学叙事如何塑造他们对科学的看法和认知。我们的研究结果得出了两个主要结论。第一,《科学怪人》神话可能有助于科学家识别公众对他们工作的担忧,并提供一个构建更积极叙事的框架。第二,找到乐观的科学叙事可能会让科学家与公众建立更好的关系。我们认为,通过展示他们工作的伦理原则和社会层面,科学家可以用一个更乐观的叙事取代负面的《科学怪人》叙事。