Ng Wai-Kuen, Chiu Conrad S C, Cheng Yue, Chan Eva T Y, Chiu Fanny L L, Collins Robert J
Cytology Quality Assurance Program Working Group, Hong Kong College of Pathologists, China.
Acta Cytol. 2006 Mar-Apr;50(2):164-77. doi: 10.1159/000325926.
To develop a local quality assurance program in cytopathology based on circulation of patient specimens on glass slides, with limited resources.
A working group was set up for design and running of the program. Participation is on a laboratory basis. The scope and frequency of testing are defined. Well-documented cases (including gynecologic, nongynecologic and fine needle aspiration cytology) with commonly encountered diagnoses are collected. Consensus concerning the diagnosis, interpretive menu and scoring system is sought before the actual slide circulations using express mail. After returning their answers to the program organizer, the participating laboratories receive immediate feedback on their scores, with reference answers, explanatory notes, "whole-mount" images of glass slides and cumulative responses of peer laboratories for on-site checking. At the end of each year, an electronic file containing representative photomicrographs of all cases examined is provided to individual laboratories for their permanent records and training purposes.
The program was launched in mid-2003. There were 24 and 27 participating laboratories from Hong Kong (and Macau) in 2003 and 2004, respectively. To date, >150 well-documented cytology cases are available in the slide pool and ready for circulation. As the revenue is mainly to cover the expenses of express mail, the program can be carried out at a relatively low cost.
In order to have any cytology quality assurance program accepted by local laboratories, it has to be fair and practical. Strict confidentiality needs to be observed throughout the process. This program emphasizes both performance assessment and educational value. Adequate representation from experienced local cytology workers, detailed documentation support from authorities and assistance from dedicated staff are essential to the success of any external proficiency testing scheme. Regular review and evaluation are also necessary for continuous improvement. The Hong Kong experience can serve as an example of running a glass slide-based cytology quality assurance program in a small region with limited resources.
利用有限资源,基于患者玻片标本的流转制定细胞病理学的本地质量保证计划。
成立一个工作组来设计和运行该计划。以实验室为单位参与。确定检测范围和频率。收集有详尽记录且诊断常见的病例(包括妇科、非妇科和细针穿刺细胞学病例)。在实际玻片流转前,通过特快专递就诊断、解读目录和评分系统征求共识。参与实验室将答案返还给计划组织者后,会立即收到关于其得分的反馈,包括参考答案、解释说明、玻片的“整装”图像以及同行实验室的累积回复以供现场核对。每年年底,会向各实验室提供一个包含所有检查病例代表性显微照片的电子文件,供其永久存档和培训使用。
该计划于2003年年中启动。2003年和2004年分别有来自香港(及澳门)的24个和27个参与实验室。迄今为止,玻片库中有超过150例有详尽记录的细胞学病例可供流转。由于收入主要用于支付特快专递费用,该计划能够以相对较低的成本实施。
为使任何细胞病理学质量保证计划被本地实验室接受,它必须公平且实用。在整个过程中都需要严格遵守保密规定。该计划既强调性能评估又注重教育价值。经验丰富的本地细胞病理学工作者的充分参与、当局的详细文件支持以及专职人员的协助对于任何外部能力验证计划的成功至关重要。定期审查和评估对于持续改进也很有必要。香港的经验可作为在资源有限的小区域开展基于玻片的细胞病理学质量保证计划的范例。