Kanai Takanori, Hibi Toshifumi, Watanabe Mamoru
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2006 May;6(5):453-66. doi: 10.1517/14712598.6.5.453.
Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are debilitating idiopathic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) with symptoms that impair ability to function and quality of life. The aetiology of IBD is inadequately understood and, therefore, drug therapy has been empirical instead of based on sound understanding of the disease mechanisms. This has been a major factor for poor drug efficacy and treatment-related side effects that often add to disease complications. The development of biologicals, notably infliximab, to block TNF-alpha reflects some progress, but there is major concern about their side effects and lack of long-term safety and efficacy profiles. However, IBD by its very nature is exacerbated and perpetuated by inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-alpha, IL-6 and IL-12, for which activated peripheral blood lymphocytes, monocytes/macrophages and granulocytes are major sources. Hence, activated leukocytes should be appropriate targets of therapy. At present, three strategies are available for removing excess and activated leukocytes by leukocytapheresis: centrifugation, Adacolumn and Cellsorba. Centrifugation can deplete lymphocytes or total leukocytes, whereas Adacolumn selectively adsorbs granulocytes and monocytes together with a smaller fraction of lymphocytes (FcgammaR- and complement receptor-bearing leukocytes), and Cellsorba non-selectively removes all three major leukocyte populations. Efficacy has ranged from 'none' to an impressive 93% together with excellent safety profiles and downmodulation of inflammation factors. Furthermore, leukocytapheresis has shown strong drug-sparing effects and reduced the number of patients requiring colectomy or exposure to unsafe immunosuppressants, such as cyclosporin A. Leukocytapheresis removes from the body cells that contribute to IBD and, therefore, unlike drugs, it is not expected to induce dependency or refractoriness.
溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和克罗恩病(CD)是使人虚弱的特发性炎症性肠病(IBD),其症状会损害身体功能和生活质量。IBD的病因尚未完全明确,因此药物治疗一直是经验性的,而非基于对疾病机制的深入理解。这是药物疗效不佳以及治疗相关副作用的主要因素,这些副作用常常会加重疾病并发症。生物制剂的研发,尤其是英夫利昔单抗用于阻断肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α),反映了一定的进展,但人们对其副作用以及缺乏长期安全性和疗效数据仍存在重大担忧。然而,IBD本质上会因包括TNF-α、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和白细胞介素-12(IL-12)在内的炎性细胞因子而加剧并持续存在,而活化的外周血淋巴细胞、单核细胞/巨噬细胞和粒细胞是这些细胞因子的主要来源。因此,活化的白细胞应是合适的治疗靶点。目前,有三种通过白细胞分离术去除过量和活化白细胞的策略:离心法、吸附柱法(Adacolumn)和细胞吸附法(Cellsorba)。离心法可减少淋巴细胞或总白细胞数量,而吸附柱法能选择性吸附粒细胞和单核细胞以及一小部分淋巴细胞(携带FcγR和补体受体的白细胞),细胞吸附法则非选择性地去除所有三种主要白细胞群体。疗效从“无”到高达93%不等,同时具有出色的安全性以及炎症因子下调作用。此外,白细胞分离术已显示出强大的药物节省效果,并减少了需要进行结肠切除术或接触不安全免疫抑制剂(如环孢素A)的患者数量。白细胞分离术从体内清除了导致IBD的细胞,因此,与药物不同,预计它不会导致依赖性或难治性。