Bram Eran, Ifergan Ilan, Shafran Assaf, Berman Bluma, Jansen Gerrit, Assaraf Yehuda G
Department of Biology, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, 32000, Haifa, Israel.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2006 Dec;58(6):826-34. doi: 10.1007/s00280-006-0230-9. Epub 2006 Apr 13.
Cellular uptake of hydrophilic antifolates proceeds via the reduced folate carrier whereas lipophilic antifolates enter cells by diffusion. Recently we have shown that transfectant cells overexpressing the mutant G482 ABCG2 displayed 120-6,250-fold resistance to hydrophilic antifolates than untransfected cells upon 4 h drug exposure, but lost almost all their antifolate resistance upon 72 h drug exposure (Shafran et al. in Cancer Res 65:8414-8422, 2005). Here we explored the ability of the wild type (WT) R482-as well as the mutant G482-and T482 ABCG2 to confer resistance to lipophilic antifolate inhibitors of dihydrofolate reductase (trimetrexate, piritrexim, metoprine and pyrimethamine) and thymidylate synthase (AG337, AG377 and AG331). Lipophilic antifolate resistance was determined using growth inhibition assays upon 72 h drug exposure. Cells overexpressing these mutant efflux transporters displayed up to 106-fold resistance to lipophilic antifolates relative to untransfected cells; this resistance was reversed by the specific and potent ABCG2 efflux inhibitor Ko143. In contrast, cells overexpressing the WT R482 ABCG2 exhibited either no or only a low-level of lipophilic antifolate resistance. These results provide the first evidence that overexpression of the mutant G482- and T482 but not the WT R482 ABCG2 confers a high-level of resistance to lipophilic antifolates. The high membrane partitioning of lipophilic antifolates along with the large confinement of ABCG2 to the plasma membrane suggest that these mutant ABCG2 transporters may possibly recognize and extrude lipophilic antifolates from the lipid bilayer. The potential implications to cancer chemotherapy as well as the mechanism of anticancer drug extrusion by these mutant exporters are discussed.
亲水性抗叶酸剂的细胞摄取通过还原型叶酸载体进行,而亲脂性抗叶酸剂则通过扩散进入细胞。最近我们发现,在药物暴露4小时后,过表达突变型G482 ABCG2的转染细胞对亲水性抗叶酸剂的抗性比未转染细胞高120 - 6250倍,但在药物暴露72小时后几乎失去了所有的抗叶酸抗性(Shafran等人,《癌症研究》65:8414 - 8422,2005)。在此,我们研究了野生型(WT)R482以及突变型G482和T482 ABCG2赋予对二氢叶酸还原酶(三甲曲沙、吡利曲辛、美托普林和乙胺嘧啶)和亲脂性抗叶酸胸苷酸合酶抑制剂(AG337、AG377和AG331)抗性的能力。通过72小时药物暴露后的生长抑制试验来测定亲脂性抗叶酸抗性。相对于未转染细胞,过表达这些突变型外排转运蛋白的细胞对亲脂性抗叶酸剂表现出高达106倍的抗性;这种抗性可被特异性强效ABCG2外排抑制剂Ko143逆转。相比之下,过表达WT R482 ABCG2的细胞要么没有亲脂性抗叶酸抗性,要么只有低水平的抗性。这些结果首次证明,突变型G482和T482而非WT R482 ABCG2的过表达赋予了对亲脂性抗叶酸剂的高水平抗性。亲脂性抗叶酸剂的高膜分配以及ABCG2在质膜上的大量局限表明,这些突变型ABCG2转运蛋白可能能够识别并从脂质双层中排出亲脂性抗叶酸剂。本文讨论了这些结果对癌症化疗的潜在影响以及这些突变型外排转运蛋白的抗癌药物外排机制。