Brandt Karen R, Gardiner John M, Macrae C Neil
School of Psychology, University of Keele, UK.
Br J Psychol. 2006 May;97(Pt 2):269-80. doi: 10.1348/000712605X73685.
We describe two experiments that tested the prediction that distinctive forenames would be better recognized than typical forenames and which investigated whether this distinctiveness effect, if obtained, occurred in subjective experiences of the recollective or familiarity components of recognition memory. To that end, the remember-know paradigm was used to measure people's experiences of recollection or familiarity. The results revealed that distinctive forenames were more memorable than typical forenames and that that this distinctiveness effect was present only in the subjective experience of remembering. Additionally, the present research showed that these distinctiveness effects were present after retention intervals of both 1 and 7 days. These results replicate and extend past research on distinctiveness effects and also provide support for Rajaram's (1996) distinctiveness-fluency account of the 2 states of subjective awareness.
我们描述了两项实验,这两项实验检验了这样一种预测,即独特的名字比普通名字更容易被识别,并且研究了如果获得这种独特性效应,它是否会出现在识别记忆的回忆或熟悉度成分的主观体验中。为此,采用了记得-知道范式来测量人们的回忆或熟悉度体验。结果显示,独特的名字比普通名字更易记忆,并且这种独特性效应仅出现在记忆的主观体验中。此外,本研究表明,在1天和7天的保留间隔后,这些独特性效应均存在。这些结果重复并扩展了以往关于独特性效应的研究,也为拉贾拉姆(1996年)关于主观意识两种状态的独特性-流畅性解释提供了支持。