• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

So what is a sham peer review?

作者信息

Chalifoux Roland

机构信息

West Virginia University, West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA.

出版信息

MedGenMed. 2005 Nov 15;7(4):47; discussion 48.

PMID:16614669
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1681729/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
So what is a sham peer review?那么什么是虚假同行评审呢？
MedGenMed. 2005 Nov 15;7(4):47; discussion 48.
2
Media mania, megalomania and misleading research: the need for caution in scientific publication.媒体狂热、自大狂与误导性研究：科学出版需谨慎行事
Vet J. 2003 Nov;166(3):213-4. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2003.08.002.
3
The limits and power of peer review.同行评审的局限性与影响力
Minn Med. 2006 Jun;89(6):43-5.
4
Retraction of articles with misleading information.撤回包含误导性信息的文章。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011 May;39(3):344. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1103900304.
5
Readers' responses to the letter by Chalifoux and the editorial by Bond in regard to "sham peer review".
MedGenMed. 2006;8(1):34; author reply 33.
6
Readers' responses to the letter by Chalifoux and the editorial by Bond in regard to "sham peer review".读者对查利富克斯的来信及邦德关于“虚假同行评审”的社论的回应。
MedGenMed. 2006 Feb 2;8(1):34; author reply 33.
7
Peer review pitfalls.
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2015;18(1):1-2. doi: 10.2174/138620731801150213123431.
8
Readers' responses to the letter by Chalifoux and the editorial by Bond in regard to "sham peer review".
MedGenMed. 2006;8(1):34; author reply 33.
9
'Bad Science' and publication ethics.《不良科学》与出版伦理
Int Nurs Rev. 2009 Sep;56(3):276. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2009.00753.x.
10
Journal of Traumatic Stress Ethics Policy.
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Feb;32(1):5-13. doi: 10.1002/jts.22364. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Focused Professional Practice Evaluation and the Weaponization of Anonymous Reporting: Erosion of Care and Fairness.聚焦式专业实践评估与匿名举报的武器化：护理与公平的侵蚀
Cureus. 2025 Jul 30;17(7):e89056. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89056. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Clinical peer Review; A mandatory process with potential inherent bias in desperate need of reform.临床同行评审：一个急需改革、存在潜在固有偏见的强制性过程。
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2021 Nov 15;11(6):817-820. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2021.1965704. eCollection 2021.
3
How broad are state physician health program descriptions of physician impairment?州医生健康计划对医生损伤的描述范围有多广？
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2018 Aug 23;13(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13011-018-0168-z.
4
When behavior disrupts the physician-healer.当行为干扰到医师-治疗者时。
MedGenMed. 2006 Mar 30;8(1):87.