Suppr超能文献

针对有家族性或遗传易感性的女性,MRISC乳腺癌筛查项目首轮与后续轮次之间的差异。

Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

作者信息

Kriege Mieke, Brekelmans Cecile T M, Boetes Carla, Muller Sara H, Zonderland Harmine M, Obdeijn Inge Marie, Manoliu Radu A, Kok Theo, Rutgers Emiel J T, de Koning Harry J, Klijn Jan G M

机构信息

The Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic, Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Cancer. 2006 Jun 1;106(11):2318-26. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21863.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Within the Dutch MRI Screening (MRISC) study, a Dutch multicenter screening study for hereditary breast cancer, the authors investigated whether previously reported increased diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with mammography would be maintained during subsequent screening rounds.

METHODS

From November 1999 to October 2003, 1909 eligible women were included in the study. Screening parameters and tumor characteristics of different rounds were calculated and compared. The authors defined 3 different types of imaging screening rounds: first round in women never screened by imaging before, first round in women screened by imaging (mainly mammography) before, and subsequent rounds.

RESULTS

The difference in sensitivity for invasive cancers between mammography and MRI was largest in the first round of women previously screened with mammography (20.0 vs. 93.3%; P=.003), but also in subsequent rounds, there was a significant difference in favor of MRI (29.4 vs. 76.5%; P=.02). The difference in false-positive rate between mammography and MRI was also largest in the first round of women previously screened with mammography (5.5 vs. 14.0%; P<.001), and it remained significant in subsequent rounds (4.6 vs. 8.2%; P<.001). Screen-detected tumors were smaller and more often lymph node negative than symptomatic tumors in age-matched control patients, but no major differences in tumor stage were found between tumors detected at subsequent rounds compared with those in the first round.

CONCLUSIONS

In subsequent rounds, a significantly higher sensitivity and better discriminating capacity of MRI compared with mammography was maintained, and a favorable tumor stage compared with age-matched symptomatic controls. As results of these subsequent screening rounds were most predictive for long-term effects, the authors expect that this screening program will contribute to a decrease of breast cancer mortality in these high-risk women.

摘要

背景

在荷兰磁共振成像筛查(MRISC)研究中,这是一项针对遗传性乳腺癌的荷兰多中心筛查研究,作者调查了与乳腺X线摄影相比,先前报道的磁共振成像(MRI)提高的诊断准确性在后续筛查轮次中是否会保持。

方法

从1999年11月至2003年10月,1909名符合条件的女性被纳入研究。计算并比较了不同轮次的筛查参数和肿瘤特征。作者定义了3种不同类型的影像筛查轮次:从未接受过影像筛查的女性的第一轮,之前接受过影像筛查(主要是乳腺X线摄影)的女性的第一轮,以及后续轮次。

结果

在先前接受过乳腺X线摄影筛查的女性的第一轮中,乳腺X线摄影和MRI对浸润性癌的敏感性差异最大(20.0%对93.3%;P = 0.003),但在后续轮次中,有利于MRI的显著差异也存在(29.4%对76.5%;P = 0.02)。在先前接受过乳腺X线摄影筛查的女性的第一轮中,乳腺X线摄影和MRI之间的假阳性率差异也最大(5.5%对14.0%;P < 0.001),并且在后续轮次中仍然显著(4.6%对8.2%;P < 0.001)。与年龄匹配的对照患者中有症状的肿瘤相比,筛查发现的肿瘤更小且更常无淋巴结转移,但与第一轮相比,后续轮次发现的肿瘤在肿瘤分期上没有重大差异。

结论

在后续轮次中,与乳腺X线摄影相比,MRI保持了显著更高的敏感性和更好的鉴别能力,并且与年龄匹配的有症状对照相比,肿瘤分期更有利。由于这些后续筛查轮次的结果对长期影响最具预测性,作者预计该筛查计划将有助于降低这些高危女性的乳腺癌死亡率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验