Conte Michael S, Bandyk Dennis F, Clowes Alexander W, Moneta Gregory L, Seely Lynn, Lorenz Todd J, Namini Hamid, Hamdan Allen D, Roddy Sean P, Belkin Michael, Berceli Scott A, DeMasi Richard J, Samson Russell H, Berman Scott S
Division of Vascular Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Apr;43(4):742-751; discussion 751. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.12.058.
The PREVENT III study was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multicenter phase III trial of a novel molecular therapy (edifoligide; E2F decoy) for the prevention of vein graft failure in patients undergoing infrainguinal revascularization for critical limb ischemia (CLI).
From November 2001 through October 2003, 1404 patients with CLI were randomized to a single intraoperative ex vivo vein graft treatment with edifoligide or placebo. After surgery, patients underwent graft surveillance by duplex ultrasonography and were followed up for index graft and limb end points to 1 year. A blinded Clinical Events Classification committee reviewed all index graft end points. The primary study end point was the time to nontechnical index graft reintervention or major amputation due to index graft failure. Secondary end points included all-cause graft failure, clinically significant graft stenosis (>70% by angiography or severe stenosis by ultrasonography), amputation/reintervention-free survival, and nontechnical primary graft patency. Event rates were based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. Time-to-event end points were compared by using the log-rank test.
Demographics, comorbidities, and procedural details reflected a population with CLI and diffuse atherosclerosis. Tissue loss was the presenting symptom in 75% of patients. High-risk conduits were used in 24% of cases, including an alternative vein in 20% (15% spliced vein and 5% non-great saphenous vein) and 6% less than 3 mm in diameter; 14% of the cases were reoperative bypass grafts. Most (65%) grafts were placed to infrapopliteal targets. Perioperative (30-day) mortality occurred in 2.7% of patients. Major morbidity included myocardial infarction in 4.7% and early graft occlusion in 5.2% of patients. Ex vivo treatment with edifoligide was well tolerated. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups in the primary or secondary trial end points, primary graft patency, or limb salvage. A statistically significant improvement was observed in secondary graft patency (estimated Kaplan-Meier rates were 83% edifoligide and 78% placebo; P = .016) within 1 year. The reduction in secondary patency events was manifest within 30 days of surgery (the relative risk for a 30-day event for edifoligide was 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.76; P = .005). For the overall cohort at 1 year, the estimated Kaplan-Meier rate for survival was 84%, that for primary patency was 61%, that for primary assisted patency was 77%, that for secondary patency was 80%, and that for limb salvage was 88%.
In this prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial, ex vivo treatment of lower extremity vein grafts with edifoligide did not confer protection from reintervention for graft failure.
PREVENT III研究是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、多中心III期试验,旨在评估一种新型分子疗法(依地福吉;E2F诱饵)预防严重肢体缺血(CLI)患者接受下肢血管重建时静脉移植物失败的效果。
2001年11月至2003年10月,1404例CLI患者被随机分为两组,术中对静脉移植物进行单次体外处理,一组使用依地福吉,另一组使用安慰剂。术后,患者接受双功超声检查进行移植物监测,并对索引移植物和肢体终点进行随访至1年。一个盲法临床事件分类委员会审查了所有索引移植物终点。主要研究终点是因索引移植物失败而进行非技术性索引移植物再次干预或大截肢的时间。次要终点包括全因移植物失败、具有临床意义的移植物狭窄(血管造影显示>70%或超声检查显示严重狭窄)、无截肢/再次干预生存以及非技术性原发性移植物通畅。事件发生率基于Kaplan-Meier估计值。使用对数秩检验比较事件发生时间终点。
人口统计学、合并症和手术细节反映了CLI和弥漫性动脉粥样硬化患者群体。75%的患者以组织缺失为主要症状。24%的病例使用了高危血管,包括20%使用替代静脉(15%为拼接静脉,5%为非大隐静脉),6%的血管直径小于3mm;14%的病例为再次手术搭桥移植物。大多数(65%)移植物放置于腘动脉以下靶点。2.7%的患者发生围手术期(30天)死亡。主要并发症包括4.7%的患者发生心肌梗死,5.2%的患者发生早期移植物闭塞。依地福吉的体外治疗耐受性良好。治疗组在主要或次要试验终点、原发性移植物通畅或肢体挽救方面无显著差异。在1年内观察到继发性移植物通畅有统计学意义的改善(依地福吉组和安慰剂组的估计Kaplan-Meier率分别为83%和78%;P = 0.016)。继发性通畅事件的减少在术后30天内显现(依地福吉组30天事件的相对风险为0.45;95%置信区间,0.27 - 0.76;P = 0.005)。对于整个队列在1年时,估计的Kaplan-Meier生存率为84%,原发性通畅率为61%,原发性辅助通畅率为77%,继发性通畅率为80%,肢体挽救率为88%。
在这项前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照的临床试验中,用依地福吉对下肢静脉移植物进行体外治疗并不能预防移植物失败的再次干预。