Brindle Timothy J, Uhl Timothy L, Nitz Arthur J, Shapiro Robert
Physical Disabilities Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1064, USA.
J Athl Train. 2006 Jan-Mar;41(1):60-6.
Using constant, variable, and absolute error to measure movement accuracy might provide a more complete description of joint position sense than any of these values alone.
To determine the effect of loaded movements and type of feedback on shoulder joint position sense and movement velocity.
Applied study with repeated measures comparing type of feedback and the presence of a load.
Laboratory.
Twenty healthy subjects (age = 27.2 +/- 3.3 years, height = 173.2 +/- 18.1 cm, mass = 70.8 +/- 14.5 kg) were seated with their arms in a custom shoulder wheel.
INTERVENTION(S): Subjects internally rotated 27 degrees in the plane of the scapula, with either visual feedback provided by a video monitor or proprioceptive feedback provided by prior passive positioning, to a target at 48 degrees of external rotation. Subjects performed the internal rotation movements with video feedback and proprioceptive feedback and with and without load (5% of body weight).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): High-speed motion analysis recorded peak rotational velocity and accuracy. Constant, variable, and absolute error for joint position sense was calculated from the final position.
Unloaded movements demonstrated significantly greater variable error than for loaded movements (2.0 +/- 0.7 degrees and 1.5 +/- 0.4 degrees, respectively) (P < .05), but there were no differences in constant or absolute error. Peak velocity was greater for movements with proprioceptive feedback (45.6 +/- 2.9 degrees/s) than visual feedback (39.1 +/- 2.1 degrees/s) and for unloaded (47.8 +/- 3.6 degrees/s) than loaded (36.9 +/- 1.0 degrees/s) movements (P < .05).
Shoulder joint position sense demonstrated greater variable error unloaded versus loaded movements. Both visual feedback and additional loads decreased peak rotational velocity.
使用恒定误差、可变误差和绝对误差来衡量运动准确性,可能比单独使用这些值中的任何一个,能更全面地描述关节位置觉。
确定负荷运动和反馈类型对肩关节位置觉及运动速度的影响。
采用重复测量的应用研究,比较反馈类型和负荷的存在情况。
实验室。
20名健康受试者(年龄 = 27.2 ± 3.3岁,身高 = 173.2 ± 18.1厘米,体重 = 70.8 ± 14.5千克)坐在定制的肩部旋转轮上,手臂置于其中。
受试者在肩胛骨平面内进行27度内旋,通过视频监视器提供视觉反馈,或通过先前的被动定位提供本体感觉反馈,达到48度外旋的目标位置。受试者在有视频反馈和本体感觉反馈的情况下,以及有和无负荷(体重的5%)的情况下进行内旋运动。
高速运动分析记录峰值旋转速度和准确性。根据最终位置计算关节位置觉的恒定误差、可变误差和绝对误差。
无负荷运动的可变误差显著大于有负荷运动(分别为2.0 ± 0.7度和1.5 ± 0.4度)(P < 0.05),但恒定误差或绝对误差无差异。有本体感觉反馈的运动峰值速度(45.6 ± 2.9度/秒)高于视觉反馈(39.1 ± 2.1度/秒),无负荷运动(47.8 ± 3.6度/秒)高于有负荷运动(36.9 ± 1.0度/秒)(P < 0.05)。
肩关节位置觉在无负荷运动与有负荷运动相比时,表现出更大的可变误差。视觉反馈和额外负荷均降低了峰值旋转速度。